Google Drive Launch Video -- Reimagined

After years of speculation and rumour, Google Drive finally shipped, complete with its own launch video. Which I’ve taken the liberty to re-imagine slightly...

Google Drive | Matrix Version narrated by Morpheus


Google Drive - Alternate Universe 1: Matrix

Google Drive | SkyNet Version narrated by Kyle Reese


Google Drive - Alternate Universe 2: SkyNet

“Google Drive is everywhere you are—on the web, in your home, at the office and on the go. So wherever you are, your stuff is just...there. Ready to go, ready to share.”

Original version:

[link]

Please share if you find this amusing!

Incidentally...



My first 10k in a long time

finisher’s medal
The obligatory finisher’s medal
Yesterday I ran in the Toronto Yonge Street 10k. It was my first race in a couple years, actually. I’ve had to deal with a succession of nagging injuries and other problems.

It was a brisk, cool morning. I’ve missed having the company of several thousand runners on the same course -- what an energizing sensation.

Watch this incredible video of Reid Coolsaet’s victory by 3/10ths of a second over Kip Kangogo. Mr Coolsaet will be representing Canada at the upcoming London Olympics...

 [LINK]

I want to get back into the discipline of a regular running regime. So this was a start. I’m completely out of running shape, and I was curious to discover my ‘ground zero’ pace.

That turned out to be about a 5:30 rate -- my time was 54:41, my worst recorded 10k race time ever (I was aiming to crack an hour, so I was pleasantly surprised).

I wasn’t 100% confident that I wouldn’t cramp up, so I stuck to a relaxed, easy lope. I didn’t push at all. Still, I was pretty done at the end. And during the run I could feel the occasional faint twinge of my complacent calves trying to cope with the unaccustomed workload.

I need to get back to the state where a 10k at that rate is a straightforward, light workout that doesn’t leave me sore the next day...

Longer term planning
My original intent was to train for this run, shoot for sub-50, and perhaps use it for a kickoff to a half-marathon in the fall. Since the training didn’t happen, I think I’m going to keep the same plan, except with ‘now’ as the starting point.

I’ll train over the summer for 10k-ish, and then ramp from there. To keep my feet to the fire, I’ll try to post updates on my progress, probably about once every five or six weeks. I’ve been considering getting one of those Nike+ or other running measurement devices. What do you think?

Hopefully I can avoid the injury bug that’s been plaguing me.

Wish me luck!

Does not inspire confidence...

If a car manufacturer can’t spell, what might that say about the quality of their product?

Chevrolet Cruze: Best in class 'saftey' (sic)
Chevrolet Cruze: Best in class ‘saftey’ (sic)

Nothing, probably. Still...

[The above was a display ad that recently ran on this blog. Ahem.]

Then again, who am I to point out typographical errors?

My Tour de Bloc Season Nine Results: Charted

This season, I decided on a whim to attend every Ontario and Quebec-based Tour de Bloc bouldering competition. I almost made it -- I had to skip the Nationals in Montréal this weekend, alas!

(If you came here for Nationals coverage -- check the links at the bottom for some great photos and highlights)

The question arose: How can I measure my performance?

Deciding What to Track
Subjective opinions aren’t sufficient. I might think I did well at a comp, but how would I know for sure? And how could I tell if I was getting any better?

A season of TdB t-shirts (lol).
L to R: Rockheads, Grand River Rocks, Climber’s Rock, Coyote, Vertical, True North, Altitude. On top: my comp shirts from Climbing Hold Review

I needed metrics: ‘How did I do versus my peers?’* Each comp session results in a ranked score, but the specific participants and the total numbers vary considerably per each event.

I settled on the following two goals as being realistic, but also requiring me to give 100% effort at each comp:
  • ‘Qualify’ for Women’s Open Finals
  • Finish out of the bottom third in Men’s Open

Having two targets somewhat mitigated the variable nature of each outing. For context, on a strong day I can climb roughly v5. I would characterize myself as an intermediate gym climber.

Results -- late-season performance
I noticed on compseason that there was an option to ‘Download the .CSV’ file of the results for each event in the system.

I wondered, Could I track my progress graphically over the course of the season?

The short answer is: not really. But it was amusing to try!

A comparison of the Tour de Bloc scores for Altitude, Coyote, and True North
Ending my Tour de Bloc season on a good note...
Score vs. (reverse) Rank: Higher, to the right = better

Observations:
  • There are less women than men (duh), and the guys score higher
  • The mens field looks more ‘evenly’ competitive -- the slope of the womens scores is sharper than the mens
  • The True North scores were a little higher -- Did that comp have easier problems than at Altitude? Or was the field that showed up stronger? Or both?
  • Qualifying for Women’s Finals is usually sufficient to finish out of the bottom third in Mens Open (this fluctuates -- see the individual comp charts)
  • I had a lousy performance at Coyote

By examining the charts and comparing my written accounts, I can get a sense of how well or poorly I did, and whether sending an extra problem or two would have made any difference in my relative positioning.

Here are the charts for each session, in date order:

Chart: TdB 11.11.05
See: Shut Up and Climb - TdB Season 9 begins!

Chart: TdB 11.12.03
See: Grand River Rocks Thrashing

Chart: TdB 12.01.04
See: Crunch Time at Climber’s Rock

Chart: TdB 12.01.28
See: Vertical Validation: Gonflé à Bloc 3e édition 

Chart: TdB 12.02.11
See: Crushed at Coyote Rock Gym

Chart: TdB 12.03.10
See: Dustin Curtis Makes Me Cry at True North Climbing

Chart: TdB 12.03.24
See: Absolution at Altitude: Tour de Bloc Season 9 Eastern Regionals

I can’t truthfully conclude much from chart to chart comparisons. There are too many variables, too many factors that can intrude. For example:
  • the set of competitors changes 
  • the number of problems varies (Coyote, True North, and Altitude had 70; Vertical had 60; Grand River and Rockheads had 50.)
  • your own performance may not be consistent
  • competitor performances may not be consistent
  • a given comp might have harder or easier problems
  • the scoring might change slightly (e.g. the scores for problem 1 might be 10, 5, 1, or they could be 19, 15, 11)
  •  a given comp might have more problems ‘in your style’, at higher or lower scores than the previous comp; the setters are different; the walls and surfaces are different
  • logistics might affect scores -- a crowded comp may interfere with your rhythm
  • time allotment -- some comps were 3 hours; others were 3.5 hours
  • travel to the event location may be tiring
  • you probably climb stronger at gyms you’re familiar with (you know the angles/have climbed the holds/have experienced the local setter styles)
  • the field might be stronger at one gym; your relative performance would suffer
  • Scores for finalists may be significantly lower than their true ability -- their strategy may involve doing ‘just enough’ to qualify for Finals, but no more. 

What does my performance look like over time? Well, the chart isn’t too meaningful -- there are only seven data points! -- but it gives a different interpretation on some of the comps:

My TdB comp % rankings (lower is better) --
Did I wind up exactly where I started?! :)

For example, I subjectively felt like I did great at Altitude, where the chart suggests it was an average performance; conversely I felt I had an ‘ok’ outing at Climber’s Rock, but the chart says it was solid...

For reference -- in case you want to do some data exploration, or generate your own personalized charts -- here is the spreadsheet containing all of the data. Check it out -- simply type your name into the specified field on the first worksheet!

Final thoughts
Yes, attending all the regional Tour de Bloc comps was ridiculous (heck, I was even the climber on the TdB website background this season) -- but it was also super fun.

I admit that I feel ambivalent about the competitive aspect of bouldering comps -- notwithstanding the premise of today’s post.

I have always focused on climbing for the enjoyment of the movement, for the pleasure of figuring out a problem, and for the personal discovery of my own physical and mental limits.

When we place ourselves in a competition versus others, does that enhance or detract from the experience?

I haven’t settled that question for myself yet. Clearly I had a great time at the TdB this season, and I definitely recommend going to a comp for anyone who’s never been. The atmosphere is invigorating.

In the end it was about having fun, meeting new people, and making good friends.

Thanks everyone for following along this season and for being so welcoming, wherever I went. Congratulations to all the participants!

See Also
• My series of posts covering the Tour de Bloc

• 2012 MEC Canadian Bouldering Championships -
Qualifier results & highlights (video):

• Womens and Mens Qualifier results (via Iyma Lamarche -- go Iyma!!)

• Finals results & highlights! (video):

Congrats to the victors, Sean McColl and Elise Sethna!! (And great job Ms. Lamarche (#2!))

• Adrian Das’ video from a routesetter’s perspective:

2012 Tour De Bloc Nationals. from A Das.

• Iyma Lamarche’s season and Nationals write-up (definitely check out this firsthand account)

• Nic Charron’s Nationals photo set

• Aaron Eden’s writeup of the Championships

I’ll link more 2012 TdB Nationals results and photos as I find them...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* At first I thought, I’ll track how I fare against my secret nemesis. This was problematic, for several reasons:
  • My secret nemesis wasn’t necessarily attending the same events
  • When she was at the same event, it was in a different category with less competition, so this might result in a lesser effort
  • She’s not a robot, and wouldn’t necessarily have identical results from session to session. Moreover, she’s also been training, and presumably improving along the way
  • Lastly, she’s gotten way too skilled for me to compete against. My ego couldn’t take it. Ahem!

Shred the Love T.O.: Boarding 4 Breast Cancer Canada Launch Event

Boarding for Breast Cancer Canada
launch event: Shred the Love T.O.
My skate friends are all stoked up about a huge launch party taking place on April 27, 2012 called “Shred the Love T.O.”

The venue for the event is Airship 37 on Parliament Street in Toronto.

The celebration is being held by Boarding For Breast Cancer (B4BC) Canada, a non-profit, youth-focused foundation for education, awareness, and fundraising.

B4BC’s mission is “to increase awareness about breast cancer, the importance of early detection and the value of an active lifestyle.”

Check out this delightful video with Skate Invader local Cindy Zhou announcing the event:



DJ Lucie Tic will be handling the music. Grindhouse is supplying the food, and the beverages are via Steam Whistle and Palm Bay.

Over $10,000 in prizes will be raffled off! (See: B4BC sponsors)

Tickets to Shred the Love T.O. are on sale now (physical tickets may also be purchased directly at Longboard Living). Each ticket gets you entered into a draw for a weekend trip for two to Blue Mountain Resort.

More info: Boarding For Breast Cancer 
Follow them on Twitter: @B4BCCanada
Past event photos: On Flickr

Come on out for a hell of a good time. It may get a little raucous...

Electric Car: Then and Now

While poking through the City of Toronto Archives, I came across a photograph taken at the Auto Show from a century ago. It takes a while to execute on an idea sometimes...

photo: 1912 Toronto auto show - electric car; 2012 Toronto Auto Show - electric car
Top: via City of Toronto Archives Fonds 1244, Item 56

What will power our vehicles 100 years from today?

Goad’s Atlas of Toronto -- Online!

I’ve cobbled together a simple online site for viewing the authoritative late-Victorian-era classic, Atlas of the City of Toronto, published by Charles Goad.

Available editions include: 1884, 1890, 1893, 1899, 1903, 1910, 1913, and 1924. Also posted is the Insurance Plan of the City of Toronto for the years 1880 and 1889, as well as a special article on the Toronto Fires of 1904 and 1895.

[See also my companion map site: Historical Maps of Toronto. Highlights include the 1858 Boulton Atlas and the 1842 Cane Topological Map of the City.]

My intent for this project was to crudely mimic the well-known reference work, The Mapping of Victorian Toronto: the 1884 & 1890 Atlases of Toronto in Comparative Rendition. Used prints of the latter are occasionally available for about $400; an original Goad’s Atlas (2nd Ed.) was recently listed for $6,500.

This version is free.
Images courtesy of Toronto Public Library, Library and Archives Canada, and City of Toronto Archives.

Click the mini-maps below, to start exploring!
For best results, use an adequate display: 1400x900 or larger is highly recommended. 

1884 Goad Atlas of the City of Toronto - Key Map
Click this map to browse the 1884 Goad Atlas of the City of Toronto!

1890 Goad Atlas of the City of Toronto - Key Map
Click to view the 1890 Atlas of Toronto (2nd ed.)

1893 Goad Atlas of the City of Toronto - Key Map
Click to view the 1893 Atlas of Toronto

1899 Goad Atlas of the City of Toronto - Key Map
Click to view the 1899 Atlas of Toronto

Click to browse the 1903 Atlas of Toronto
Click to view the 1903 Atlas of Toronto

Click to browse the 1910 Insurance Plan of Toronto
Click to view the 1910 Atlas of Toronto (3rd ed.)

Click to view the 1913 Atlas of Toronto

Click to view the 1924 Atlas of Toronto


Special Bonus Updates:

Bonus 1: Click to view the 1880 Insurance Plan

Click to browse the 1889 Insurance Plan of Toronto
Bonus 2: Click to view the 1889 Insurance Plan

Bonus 3: The Great Toronto Fires of 1904 -- and 1895

Extra Special Bonus: 1858 Boulton Atlas of Toronto
See Also: 1842 Cane Topographical Map of the City and Liberties of Toronto

The History of Charles Goad’s Fire Insurance Plans

photograph of Charles E. Goad, publisher of the Goad Atlases
Charles E. Goad
Charles Edward Goad was a civil engineer and publisher, whose principal endeavour was the compilation of meticulously-detailed, scaled maps for use by insurance underwriters, the real estate industry, and private fire brigades, in the assessment of premiums and fire risk.

His Chas. E. Goad Company held a quasi-monopoly on this business in the late 1800s, ultimately surveying over 1,300 communities across Canada, as well as around the world -- including the United Kingdom, France and Mexico.

Researchers delving into the history of buildings in Toronto inevitably wind up scrutinizing and comparing the various extant editions of the ‘Goad fire insurance maps’. By examining the differences between revisions, historians can roughly tell: when a given structure was built (or demolished), what it was made of, its placement in relation to other buildings, and even its shape.  

1892 Goads Atlas Key
1889 Goad Plan Key
Notably, these fire insurance maps were never sold, but instead were leased to customers as part of a long-term subscription service.

The maps had to be frequently updated in order to remain current -- a daunting task when surveying a rapidly expanding community such as Victorian-era Toronto. Instead of printing new copies, revisions took the form of paper stickers, which were overlaid on top of the maps!

The expense and effort of producing the large-format, colored atlases usually meant that few copies were printed. Many archival instances originate from customers who failed to return or destroy their copies.

Describing the Goad maps for BlogTO, Derek Flack writes,
“With its identification of buildings both big and small, Goad’s Atlas operates like a proto-Google Satellite map, where the viewer can get a sense for the urban environment on a street by street basis rather than just in a macro capacity. For the contemporary map-reader, this level of detail underscores just how much the city has changed in the last century.” 
Along with his surveyors, Charles E. Goad gained a unique first-hand knowledge of Toronto that went far beyond that of anyone else -- ever -- during the process of relentlessly combing through each and every street in our burgeoning city.

My first Goad Atlas encounter

I first stumbled across the Goad Atlases during my research into the history of the recently-demolished Doty Engine Works at the corner of Front and Bathurst.

I was fascinated by Goad’s colourful depiction of the built fabric of Toronto during the late 1800s. The neigbourhood I was investigating looked like this:

Plate 19, 1884 Goad Atlas of Toronto
1884 Goad Atlas of Toronto - Plate 19
Observe, for example, what happens at the corner of Front and Bathurst...
(Click maps to expand)

I marvelled at the evolution, over time, of the character of the streets, and at the heavy influence of the railway south of Front Street. Not to mention -- the maps are beautiful to behold.

Plate 19, 1890 Goad Atlas of Toronto
1890 Goad Atlas of Toronto - Plate 19 (This is the Toronto Archives’ lurid scan)
Comparing editions allows you to identify changes taking place in the neighbourhood

Plate 19, 1893 Goad Atlas of Toronto
1893 Goad Atlas of Toronto - Plate 19
See the crooked overlay on the Doty Engine Works?

Discover the past of your own Toronto neighbourhood, through a similar examination -- it’s just a few clicks away. Revelatory insights into the history of our city’s development await you.

It does make you wonder -- one day perhaps, 100 years from now -- and 200 years after Charles Goad’s systematic peregrinations through our lanes and byways -- will amateur historians sleuth endlessly through rescued Google Street View database backups, trying to decipher our contemporary urban architecture?

Please ‘Like’, share, link, or forward this post. I hope that other Toronto heritage enthusiasts will find it useful. Have fun exploring Victorian Toronto!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extended Discussion: Why I put these maps online

The value-add for this project is not the content, which is already available online, through other sources. It’s the complementary provision of that content via an effective (albeit rudimentary) interface that allows anyone to quickly identify, and access specific plates from the Goad Atlases.

An update sticker from the 1889 Goad Insurance Plan of Toronto: tracking which revisions had been applied to a given copy -- this plan was printed in 1880, and has five sets of updates applied to it, up to August 1889

Online Frustration
I was dissatisfied with the existing modes for browsing the Atlases. Nothing ever compares to leisurely peering at a fragile copy in person -- but online access is often more convenient.

Not surprisingly, the City of Toronto Archives offers a fine selection of Goad maps through their website.

Sadly, the images are trapped inside an arcane, patent-encumbered file format that requires the installation of either: an obscure third-party extension -- compatible only with long-obsolete versions of Internet Explorer or Firefox (c’mon, be serious -- Firefox 2?!) -- or a closed-source, commercial application. The sole available developer has also chosen not to support the Linux or OS X platforms, going so far as to remove older versions of software that previously worked.

screenshot: third party browser extension needed for MrSID images
‘Install this crappy 3rd-party extension onto your ancient browser version that has been phased out. And that’s if you have that specific browser, for that particular operating system.’ Umm...

If you’re nevertheless able to setup a Windows system and install the extension, you’ll then discover that the user interface to handle the images is pathetic. It’s awkward, and kludgy -- a reliving of terrible 1990s UI that will make you gnash your teeth in aggravation.

I will concede that the Archives’ scans do have a vibrant, almost lurid quality to them that accentuates the age of the source material (see Plate 19 scan for 1890 above for example)...

Meanwhile, the Toronto Public Library also provides Goad maps via the Internet -- but the catalogue fails to display the plates in any useful order, or with sufficient identifying information. You can sort everything by year, but you can’t sort -- or view -- plate numbers on the catalogue thumbnails, or in the titles -- which forces you to load each individual entry!

Further, the thumbnails are much too small and fuzzy for my near-sighted eyes. Again, a miserable experience -- nothing’s quite like sifting through 300 entries to find a desired plate...

Excerpted sample TPL catalogue search results. Can you distinguish which plate is which? I can’t. Results shown here are, in date-sorted order:
Plates 19, 13, 17, and 29 from 1884. Sigh. 

A brief hands-on exercise will illustrate my point. I defy you to unearth plate 59 from the 1889 edition of the Insurance Plan of Toronto -- that’s the section covering King and Bathurst -- out of the TPL catalogue. Just try it. I’ll even award a special prize to the first reader to successfully send me the file. I can wait...

[Update May 9, 2012: It turns out there is a secret ninja cataloguer method to directly search for specific plates. In this TPL local history blog post (which happens to link to this site as an ‘Additional Source’!), I discovered:
If you know the Plate Number, enter the year of the atlas and the Plate Number preceded by two zeros  e.g. goad toronto 1884 0025
Cool!! But it’s too late for me, I’ve already put up this site! Haha. Note that you still won’t be able to find plate 59 above even if you try this method...]

Finally, Library and Archives Canada has an online collection of Goad maps and materials (see links at bottom of post) -- but you may only navigate linearly through five plate thumbnails at a time -- and you must start at the beginning -- which entails a tedious, interminable slog to locate the plate you want -- and that’s if you know the plate number.

Library and Archives Canada website: Great scans; painful navigation.

For anyone trying to access these glorious maps from home, this situation is lousy. A century after Charles Goad left us, the most effective method of accessing his work remains leafing through a physical copy at the Reference Library!

I was inspired by the example of W. Xavier Snelgrove, who, encountering the issues identified above at the Archives (for a different resource), reacted by extracting and posting a set of Toronto maps which will be immediately familiar to anyone who has gone to the Archives, or visited the 4th floor of the Toronto Reference Library.

The summary benefit: Simple navigation to the plates you want. A solution that works with any major browser on any platform; no special extra software required. It’s the way the Archives website should work -- if you didn’t have to wrestle with that idiotic software extension.

Toronto Island, Plate 30, 1893 Goad Atlas of Toronto
The ‘Island of Hiawatha’ in 1893 (Plate 30)
See Hanlan’s Hotel on Gibraltar Point. And Ward’s on the other end!

What I’ve Done, and Future Ideas

I downloaded all of the Toronto Atlas plate images for 1884, 1890, 1893, 1899, 1903, and 1910, as well as the 1889/1892 Insurance Plan of Toronto, from the public domain scans posted by the Toronto Public Library and Library and Archives Canada. I then re-uploaded the images -- untouched and at full-resolution -- and linked them all. Straightforward, unsophisticated work.

This website may be considered as a digital alternative to The Mapping of Victorian Toronto. The latter does not show all the plates in colour (a real shame); nor does it include 1893, 1899, 1903 or 1910 (though it does have a solid introduction by Lucy Booth Martyn). Comparing plates online is simple -- open the same plate for different years, in adjoining tabs.

Should you find any linking errors, or historical inaccuracies -- let me know in the comments. Setting up the links was monotonous (does anyone enjoy creating image-maps in HTML?) so there is a distinct possibility of minor gaffes...

Cleaner, less-clumsy methods of presentation certainly exist. I settled on the most efficient and direct approach available to me involving the least work. 

I welcome -- in fact I challenge readers to contemplate -- a jazzed-up, interactive version, or a gigantic ‘all in one file’ image carefully stitched together (which, alas, is problematic due to varying map scales). Or perhaps some kind of modern-day overlay/comparison tool... How about a location-aware iPad app that contextually displays where you are, on the map? etc.

With this spirit in mind, I’ve placed all of the Goad images I’ve liberated onto Dropbox for easy download: 1884189018931899. Bonus: 1889 Insurance Plan; 1903 Atlas, 1910 Atlas. Don’t want to rely on my website or a fickle internet connection? No problem! Download the files for yourself, and enjoy your own local archive.

Plate 3, 1884 Goad Atlas of Toronto, Union Station, Queen's Hotel
A wealth of fascinating details abide in Plate 3 from the 1884 edition, e.g.: The waterfront was much farther north... Union Station was still in its second incarnation (construction on the present-day station wasn’t until 1914)... Note the Queen’s Hotel (present day Royal YOrk) and Zoological Gardens (!)

I may -- or may not -- eventually set up the 1889 Insurance Plan, if the fancy strikes me. [Update April 25, 2012: Due to overwhelming positive feedback, I’ve added the 1889 Insurance Plan. And the atlases for 1903 and 1910!] [Update October, 2012: I’ve added the 1880 Insurance Plan, and a special bonus post on the Toronto Fires of 1904 and 1895]

Hasn’t this been done already? That’s a question I’ve pondered. All the Archives has to do is convert their existing files from MrSID to jpgs -- something an adept intern could do via automation in an afternoon, or manually in a week.  Meanwhile, the Library could simply tweak their catalogue meta-data to produce useful sub-sorted results.

... But I didn’t feel like waiting. And besides, having my own mini-Goad repository is pleasurable. Set your own up -- you, too have the content now.

Acknowledgements
Grateful acknowledgement is extended to the TPL, and Library and Archives Canada, for providing public access to the scans. I also thank W. Snelgrove (whoever you are) for the inspiration, and Cazza for the light beta-testing and feedback. And thank you for reading!

I deeply appreciate the many kind words of encouragement I have received, and the assistance from various parties in spreading the word about the site. I wish to specifically mention the urbantoronto.ca Rare Maps forum thread, the Ontario Genealogical Society (Toronto Branch), Toronto Historic Sites, the Toronto Historical Association, Torontoist, Lost Toronto, Jessica Page, Patrick Cain, Built Heritage News, the TRL staff and the Photographic Historical Society of Canada for their help. You folks are awesome!

Links and Resources

Toronto Public Library
Search the online catalogue for ‘Fire Insurance -- Maps’
Also: see this TPL Local History and Genealogy blog post

City of Toronto Archives
Fire Insurance Plans
(requires MrSID-capable extension or application to view)
(but they’ve got 1913 and 1924!)

Library and Archives Canada 
(usable, but painful to browse)
Atlas of the city of Toronto and suburbs, 1884 (1st ed.)
Atlas of the city of Toronto and vicinity, March 1890 (2nd ed.)
Revised November 1894
Revised March 1899
Atlas of the city of Toronto and suburbs, in three volumes, 1910 (3rd ed.): Vol. OneTwoThree
Revised May 1912: Vol. OneTwo (Sept 1912), Three (Oct 1913)
BTW you can order original 1:1 tiff files (the highest resolution) from L&AC.
Charles E. Goad Company fonds (Click ‘Show Arrangement Structure’ -- view maps for cities across Canada!)

Dropbox links for easy download of all the images
1884189018931899, 1903, 1910 Atlases. (each set is ~50 to 130mb)
1889 Insurance Plan (~166mb)

Other

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Misc. comments that can be skipped 
The discussion around my dissatisfaction, while critical in tone, is NOT intended to disparage the referenced institutions. The Library and Archives do a fine job -- despite being woefully under-resourced -- of making historical materials accessible. They are forced to to operate within the context of their allotted infrastructure, and I am sure they are well aware of the resulting limitations. My implementation here has its own drawbacks. To each his own!

Technical note: the derided file format mentioned above, 'MrSID', is no doubt technically superior to simple JPGs for capturing sophisticated mapping data (it was originally developed “under the aegis of the U.S. government for storing fingerprints for the FBI.”). Its disadvantages in this particular use case are: 1) it’s not a common file format, and therefore you can’t view the images without a corresponding browser extension or specialized application; 2) the sole browser-extension and reader-application for this file format come from a single commercial company -- there is no open source viewer for this file format; and 3) the available extension has a dismal, confusing interface. So, bottom line, for the purpose of browsing these maps, the MrSID file format is not generally practical for casual users. I acknowledge without hesitation that the format holds advantages within the context of applications for specialized GIS and other dedicated mapping systems. In fact, if you were to add geo-location metadata to these images, that would be darn cool! But this hasn’t been done, and it won’t be.

Format: using Blogger to serve up the content is sort of a structural perversion. But it’s free. Also, using Photobucket to host the images gives me pause. But again -- it’s free. I could have linked directly to the TPL server images -- but you never know when URL paths or availability might change due to an upgrade, or whatever. Three cheers for quick and dirty!

IPad3 downsampling: Sadly, browsing the images via Safari an IPad3 is currently hampered by downsampling. You’ll have to wait for Apple to fix this.

Reader challenge: It’s a trick. Plate 59 -- as far as I can tell -- does not exist in the Catalogue. But my point is, there is no way to easily tell this, short of manually loading and examining every sheet in the database!

Nomenclature: I have herein colloquially referred to the ‘Goad Atlases’ using a variety of different names, and moreover lazily conflated the Atlases with the separate ‘Insurance Plans’; I readily concede this is sloppy practice and that properly speaking, they are separate kinds of maps, and further, each distinct edition has a strict name that should be used to avoid confusion. In my defense -- “you know what I mean.” (eye-rolling commences) Those of you that know the difference, know the difference. Those of you that don’t, don’t care. 

Regarding copyrightThe term of copyright for fire insurance plans is a period not exceeding 90 years after 1976, when production of the plans was discontinued (this was the result of a 1993 agreement between CGI, the ostensible copyright holder, and Library and Archives Canada and Ontario Archives, in which restrictions on reproducing maps less than ninety years old were implemented. There are no restrictions on reproduction for research and private study.) So technically the 1924 map is skirting the edge here, but -- the CTA put it up online first! At any rate I have no qualms about posting the maps.  

Lastly, I am well aware that the Chas A. Goad company continued to produce gorgeous, invaluable maps well past Goad’s death in 1910 -- so the Atlases are not strictly constrained to the Victorian era, as might seem implied by the discussion and the sub-site. 

Godspeed!