Showing posts with label toronto. Show all posts
Showing posts with label toronto. Show all posts

Heritage Toronto Award: Historical Maps of Toronto

I am the delighted recipient of the 2014 Heritage Toronto Award of Merit (Media category) for my site, Historical Maps of Toronto.

Gee, I’ve always wanted... Rob Ford’s signature?!

The Award was presented to me at last evening’s 40th Annual Heritage Toronto Awards at Koerner Hall. It pleases me considerably to see that Torontonians are using the site as a research resource on a regular basis.

Receiving the award from Alexandra Pike, Heritage Toronto Board Chair

The full list of people I have to thank is extensive, but luckily I’ve already written it up (scroll down to ‘Thanks and Acknowledgments’). Carrie Martin, Elise Paradis, Stephen Otto, and anyone who ‘bought me coffee’: thank you so much for your support.

Historical maps are like a series of snapshots in time. They illustrate the fascinating story of Toronto’s evolution from a compact town a little over two hundred years ago, into the bustling metropolis we know today. Rich in informative detail, yet often overlooked, they lend us a proper sense of context, and of place. They are powerful artifacts which capture Toronto’s defining tension: the ever-present impetus for change, pushing against the influence of what came before.

It is my pleasure to share them with the rest of Toronto—because history belongs to all of us.

If you’re into old maps or the history of early Toronto, I invite you to visit Historical Maps of Toronto, as well as its sister site Fort York and Garrison Common Maps.

The Fort York Visitor Centre: An Important Step Forward

The Fort York Visitor Centre is about to open. It is a marvellous accomplishment.

The Fort York Visitor Centre: in harmony with its surroundings

Decades (literally!) of patient, persistent work, wrangling, and planning went into making the Visitor Centre a reality. A generation of stakeholders and all levels of government have been involved.

The Fort has been an oft-forgotten, sometimes neglected gem in the heart of the city, but the Visitor Centre marks an important step forward in the evolution and life of the Fort.

The Visitor Centre is a clean, elegant, low-slung building that somehow manages the trick of bringing solemnity to the underside of the Gardiner Expressway. It was designed by Patkau Architects Inc. / Kearns Mancini Architects Inc. and has already won awards.

On duty at the Visitor Centre entrance

I’m one of those fusty stick-in-the-mud types who are highly resistant to change, and I was anxious that the Visitor Centre might turn out to be an over-expressive architectural carbuncle drawing attention away from the actual historic site.

Not to worry.

The Fort now has a world-class facility with which to welcome visitors and provide context for the history of Toronto, as well as host events and exhibits. It’s part of an overall vision that recognizes that the Fort and the accompanying Garrison Common are an integral part of the community and have a participatory role to play.

Beautiful, functional gallery space 

Inside, the Visitor Centre seems well-laid out, and I look forward to seeing how the space is used by different exhibits. The Immersive Ramp on the upper level is particularly intriguing; I want to see how it develops.

On display at the moment (in addition to materials relating to the First World War) is a donation of 11 paintings inspired by the War of 1812 by noted artist Charles Pachter (if you’ve been to College subway station, you’ve seen his handiwork).

Thirst for Victory, by Charles Pachter
City of Toronto Museums, A14-33

The Fort York Visitor Centre is celebrating its opening this weekend with the On Common Ground Festival. Check it out!

Get Fortified!

p.s. while you’re in the neighbourhood, be sure to drop in to the recently opened 99th branch of the Toronto Public Library, the Fort York branch on Bathurst.

Fort York branch of the TPL

Further reading:


Full disclosure: the Friends of Fort York and I collaborate together on the website, Fort York and Garrison Common Maps.

You’ll Love Exploring Toronto From 1818 To 2012 With This Amazing Interactive Map. Check Out 1947!

Apologies for the Buzzfeed-style headline, but this is a project I want to share widely. You’ll enjoy it, I promise.

Toronto Historic Map viewer—an interactive online map

Click to launch the Toronto Historic Maps viewer by Chris Olsen.

Easily pan around (Google-maps style), zoom in and out, and best of all—switch between years to watch how the city evolves over time. For optimal results, use a decent computer with a modern browser and a fast internet connection. Requires Flash (sorry), and may take a few seconds to initially load.

Background context
Over the last couple of years, I put together several online projects relating to historical maps of Toronto. A key motivation was to aggregate maps from different institutional sources, as previously they were difficult to discover, navigate and browse. My hope was to provide a simple, easy-to-use entry point for researchers, students, and other Toronto history enthusiasts to access these important documents from our past. 

To my delight, another aficionado with a passion for maps recently leveraged that work to create something new and marvellous. This is what happens with shared historical information and open data—everyone benefits.

In my blog post about Goad’s Atlas of the City of Toronto—Online!, I challenged readers to “imagine a jazzed-up, interactive version, or a gigantic ‘all in one file’ image carefully stitched together”.

That line apparently resonated with Chris Olsen, an analyst at ESRI (the premier Geographical Information System technology vendor), and he nimbly took up my challenge.

Olsen had previously created well-received historical map viewers for Cleveland and Pittsburgh. He learned of my Goad and Historical Maps of Toronto projects, and decided to implement a map viewer instance for Toronto, seeing as the source images had conveniently been assembled in one spot by yours truly.

The amount of work he invested is prodigious. To create the site, Olsen georeferenced and then melded together map plates from the Goad fire insurance plans (1880, 1889, 1913 and 1924). He also incorporated maps from 1818, 1842, and aerial photographs from 1947. At my urging he added the 1858 Boulton Atlas of the City of Toronto (a predecessor map to the Goad plans). I’ve contacted the City of Toronto Archives to find out if we can obtain the source imagery for some of their post-1947 aerial photography series so they can be added to the project (No response yet, but we’ll see what happens).

photo: Old Fort York as seen by plane in 1947
Recognize this famous Toronto landmark?

[Note to techies: Yes, Olsen’s georeferenced files are public and free to use. Depending on the application, users can access them in ArcMap by connecting here, or if within a web application, here.]

I have often envisioned doing something like this, but was stymied by the technical and resource requirements to get it together. I’m incredibly happy that someone else felt the same way—and actually did something about it.

The value in this project is the ability to scrutinize how Toronto buildings, neighbourhoods and streetscapes change between years. Even in the gap between 1947 and 2012, the differences—as well as the things that stay the same—can be astonishing.

Mr. Olsen is to be thanked for gifting us with this engrossing and novel way of exploring old Toronto. It pleases me to have contributed (even if merely peripherally) to his endeavour. This sort of initiative is exactly why organizing the maps together was so important to me in the first place—it enables people to find, use, and build on the resources in new and exciting ways. History belongs to all of us!

Readers, let me know in the comments if you discover anything neat. I know you will.

See Also
Historical Maps of Toronto
Goad’s Atlas of the City of Toronto—Online!
Fort York and Garrison Common Maps

Want to go to a Toronto Historic Museum for Free?

Here’s a good deal for you! How would you like a free family admission to any City of Toronto Historic Museum? Toronto Historic Sites is giving away passes for a limited time.

Hurry while supplies last...
The passes are valid for a single family visit before October 31, 2013, to one of the ten museums, which include Fort York, Colborne Lodge, and Mackenzie House. It’s a great way to see the city’s rich history firsthand, and to learn about its past.

Follow this link to catch the offer while it’s on.


Liona Boyd — The Toronto Song! Cheese or Magic?

There’s been some harsh criticism levelled at Liona Boyd’s newly released tune celebrating our city, The Toronto Song!, premiering at the start of this year’s Taste of the Danforth festival.



Torontoist calls the treacly melody “bizarre.” Spacing magazine describes it as “maybe the most soul-less piece of schlock ever produced.” Other online commenters use the adjectives surreal, embarrassing, lame, and awful.

I say, stuff it, haters.

Liona Boyd: so in love with Toronto
Boyd’s work here is so earnest I can’t bring myself to dislike it; my usual jaded cynicism is defeated by the video’s wholesome sincerity. Yes, the song is hokey and saccharine. But that’s how these songs are supposed to be.

It’s meant for families and tourists. It’s meant to welcome strangers and embrace us all.

Compare past songs with similar intents, and you’ll find they share a penchant for wide-eyed boosterism:
Even Let’s Go to the Ex, which has that catchy jingle, is super corny.

Just like these other 'anthems', Boyd’s song reflects a certain time and place, and conveys a relentlessly enthusiastic perspective about Toronto. And perhaps one day we’ll look back and laugh together.

Listen to: Liona Boyd being interviewed about the song on 680 News (To download: right-click --> save as; MP3)

See also: Ed Keenan’s reaction.

Bonus links

What would Google Maps for Toronto look like in 1858?

It amuses me to present the following zoomable, scrollable online version of the 1858 Boulton Atlas of the City of Toronto and Vicinity, surveyed and compiled by W.S. and H.C. Boulton.

Scroll around, and zoom in & out using your mouse—just like you would in Google maps!

View the map in full page mode here.



I’m not sure how useful this is as a historical tool, but it merits at least 30 seconds’ worth of hey this is neat. Try your scroll wheel! (Sorry iPad users; this demo requires a full featured browser)

Thanks go to Carrie Martin for volunteering to help stitch this together and putting up with my nattering edits.

[Note: if you’re into historical maps, you might want to check out my larger projects:


Update: Media Coverage

This post generated a fair amount of online discussion and coverage. Here’s a sample of the chatter:
and a mention on the CBC Metro Morning show:




The Background Story

Earlier this spring, I made an online gallery of the Boulton Atlas, a set of 30 detailed map plates of Toronto created in 1858 by WS Boulton.

But I wasn’t entirely satisfied with the way it was presented. Although I created a key map to help users, I still found it awkward to look up an individual plate.

I wanted to make a composite version of the Atlas—that is, to stitch together all of the plates to form a super-map of the entire city.

Of course I’m not the first person to have this notion. In 2009 E.R.A. Architects created a huge wall-map version for their Harbourfront exhibit, Found Toronto.

I asked the kind folks at E.R.A. if they still possessed the original file from the exhibit, and if I could acquire it to put online. They were extremely helpful, and graciously took the time to search for it, but unfortunately, all they had left on their system was a low resolution copy.

Similarly, a composite was done for the book Historical Atlas of Toronto by Derek Hayes, but the resolution was scaled down (as it only needed to fit in a coffee-table size book) and all the useful detail was lost.

So, I decided to recreate my own stitched-together-version. Lacking a computer with sufficient horsepower, I inveigled my friend Carrie to help me out — she actually did the labour. Thanks again Carrie! [A small nod also goes to the several others who volunteered to assist]

The resulting image is modestly hefty—24,108 x 11,405 (about 275 megapixels) in size.

Challenges

There were some unavoidable issues and compromises.

The Boulton maps are each lithographed onto separate physical plates. Although they are ostensibly all drawn at the same scale, they are not exactly so (at least not with modern precision in mind). As well, the physical plates have aged differently depending on their individual exposure to light and air, resulting in colour contrasts between plates. Finally, the digital scans to which I had access were not all at the same scale (major pain in the neck!).

As a result, the stitching is far from seamless. Imagine putting together a puzzle where the pieces don’t actually fit together.

We tried our best to preserve alignments where possible, but (deliberately) sacrificed accurate placement along certain streets/seams. Subtle changes in scan orientation wind up being grossly magnified when trying to stitch together multiple plates.

In my view the sole truly egregious problem is just east of Carlton and Parliament; the street formerly known as Elm gets semi-obliterated; everything else is ‘close enough’. Queen and (the modern) College St., being the two horizontal seams, suffer the most. Meanwhile several north/south streets (e.g. Yonge) are allowed to wax and wane in width (to a degree that some may find disturbing) in order to force neighbouring streets to align correctly.

I’m comfortable with the minor distortions introduced; it’s a lot harder than it looks! If you think you can do a better job, you’re welcome to download the plates and try it yourself. Anyway, please blame Carrie for any errors (haha).

The scan images are courtesy of the Toronto Public Library: 912.71354 B594 1858.

Enjoy!

[personal aside to any geographers / cartographers out there: Yes, I know this should properly be done as some kind of layer in ArcGIS, then re-made into new map tiles, for browsing via open street maps or whatever, which would allow all kinds of interesting data overlays etc. You are cordially invited to invest the effort to do so. I’ll probably get around to it, if and when zoom.it ceases working.]

Fire at Broadview and Gerrard Destroys Century-old Corner Building

A four-alarm blaze at Broadview and Gerrard this past weekend has caused major damage to the south-east corner building, which has stood there for about a hundred years.

'Cai Yuan pano 4' by Craig Jenkins; used with permission.
View additional fire photos by Jenkins here

Work crews are now busy demolishing the structure, which housed the Cai Yuan supermarket and numerous residents above it. It’s unclear whether the building can be saved. We’ll see!

Work crews assessing the damage and and beginning demolition.

This may eventually lead to a change in the tenor and character of the East Chinatown neighbourhood. I’m not going to pretend that it was a ‘pretty’ building; nevertheless the structure has anchored that corner for a century and is accordingly part of the fabric of the area. It has seen many uses and will be missed.

In 1914 the building was used by Fred Jacobs, chemist (pharmacist).
Image courtesy City of Toronto Archives. (h/t: @wherethestory)
A postcard view looking south on Broadview circa 1911.
Image via Chuckman's collection
Entry for Jacobs at 361 Broadview
in the 1906 Might's City Directory for Toronto

I’ve passed by this building countless times in the past couple of years, en route to my local climbing gym. While it may not be a designated heritage property, it has become a familiar mental landmark for me. I hope the former tenants are able to find a new place to live.

An oft-busy supermarket in Toronto’s east Chinatown
Image courtesy Simon Fraser University

While East Chinatown may appear somewhat ragged and run-down to the outside observer, it is really like a charming village. The atmosphere is laid-back and unassuming, a contrast to the bustle of the downtown core.

I hope that whatever takes shape on the intersection stays true to the neighbourhood — please, no stucco or glass monstrosities!

Congratulations to RaBIT! A Big Step Forward

Congratulations to the Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto (RaBIT):

RaBIT button!
The vote was 26 to 15. It’s an important step forward in the timeline for this reform to occur by the 2018 election. There are still hurdles remaining in this lengthy process — but it’s happening, slowly but surely.

Congratulations to the team of volunteers on their accomplishment! Thanks also to Councillor Paul Ainslie for his leadership on this initiative.

On to the next phase... getting Queen’s Park to approve. If you’d like to support this reform, check out RaBIT here.

See also
Why I Support the Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto (And Why You Should, Too!)

Why is tree climbing illegal in Toronto?

Last week a man was fined $365 for climbing a tree at Bellevue Park in Kensington Market. Could it be that tree-climbing is illegal in Toronto?

The answer, it turns out, is yes. Several bylaws prohibit climbing of various kinds within the city. This was a surprising discovery to me, as someone who has occasionally clambered up statues and done easy (only non-sketchy) ‘buildering’ just for fun. And who hasn’t climbed a tree?

Out of curiosity I looked up the applicable sections of our municipal code. Here’s what they have to say...

Climbing in parks (mostly) prohibited
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 608 (Parks), section 6, established under BY-LAW No. 854-2004, states:
No person shall in a park: a) Climb a building, structure or equipment, unless it is equipment designed for climbing; [...] c) Unless authorized by permit, climb, move or remove the whole or any part of a tree, rock, boulder, rock face or remove soil, sand or wood.
Apparently you can’t climb stuff in Toronto parks! I wonder if it’s even possible to obtain a permit. It would be funny to apply to Toronto Parks for one and see what happens. Incidentally according to clause e) of this section, you can’t throw snow inside a park either. No snowball fights, kids—it’s illegal.

Climbing stuff in Yonge-Dundas Square prohibited
In Article III, 636-11 (Public Squares) from City of Toronto By-law No. 1001-2001:
No person shall, within the limits of a square: a) Climb or be on any, tree, roof of a building or any part of a building, structure or fixture, except any portion which is a public walkway.
This bylaw appears to specifically pertain to Yonge-Dundas Square [Minor note: this used to be Ch. 270, which was deleted by the above Bylaw] rather than all public squares. I find it mildly amusing that 'being' on a tree or building is impermissible as well.

Climbing street trees and posts prohibited
Under City of Toronto By-law No. 375-2012, Chapter 743-9, Fouling and obstructing streets:
... k) No person shall climb on or over a railing, bridge or fence located along or across any street, or climb on any tree located in a street, or on any post, pole or structure installed on any street.
Of course there are plausible reasons for bylaws like these. You don’t want people damaging trees, injuring themselves or others through dangerous behaviour, or messing up structures. Further, our municipal code is filled with historical cruft (though, in the case of the tree climbing clauses these are relatively recent updates).

It seems excessive. When you have so many obscure laws like this, it creates the potential for abuse by authority through arbitrary and discretionary enforcement.

And besides, if I fall out of a tree and break my arm—that’s my own fault. I don’t need a bylaw to tell me that. At least there seems to be room for climbing trees on private property.

Will I think twice the next time I look at a section of wall or a nice sculpture and say to myself, “I bet I could climb that!”? We’ll see...


Original photo credit: Tree Climbing by Alec Couros. Modified and used under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Related:
Is skateboarding illegal in Toronto?

Why I Support the Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto (And Why You Should, Too!)

Very few people are passionate about—let alone interested in—municipal election reform. Probably 50% of my regular readers will never make it past the first sentence of this post.

I concede that it’s an eye-glazing subject.

Nevertheless, I want to inform you about a simple, incremental improvement to the way we could do voting in Toronto, that needs your support.

The proposed change is known as Instant Runoff Voting (IRV). It is championed by a group called Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto, or RaBIT for short. And it’s actually pretty close to happening.


The Plurality Problem

A major issue with our current 'first past the post' system for city elections is that council candidates are often elected with less than an absolute majority of votes within their ward. In races with 3 or more strong candidates there is a tendency for vote-splitting to occur, with the result that some candidates take the victory, even though an absolute majority of voters would not have voted for them.

This video featuring Dave Meslin explains the issue, and the proposed solution:

[LINK]

How IRV Works

Instant Runoff Voting uses ranked ballots in an attempt to eliminate vote splitting. What happens is that voters submit ballots with their choices in ranked order of preference. If no one wins an absolute majority, the candidate with the least votes is eliminated and those ballots then have their 2nd preferred choices counted in a second round. This process continues recursively until one candidate has attained an absolute majority of support. [Oh, and you can still just vote for one candidate. You don’t have to submit a ranked ballot if you don’t want to.]

It’s not a perfect approach, but here’s why you should support it:


The Benefits of IRV 

  1. It eliminates vote splitting. People are free to vote for the candidates they truly support, without the fear of ‘wasting’ their vote on a candidate who isn’t going to win.
  2. It promotes participation and diversity in elections. Candidates who might otherwise drop out or be dissuaded from participating, can now run without being perceived as ‘taking away’ votes from other candidates with similar support bases.  
  3. It promotes a more positive and substantive approach to campaigning. Candidates need to consider attracting the '2nd rank' votes of their opponents. The best way of doing that will be through persuasive communication of ideas, not by adopting negative tactics and name-calling. 

And there’s one more advantage to IRV that may be the most critical element of all: it’s practical and pragmatic—it’s an easy to understand improvement. Other approaches are too unwieldy and complicated to implement, at least within the timeframe for the 2018 municipal elections. The reality is that we won’t achieve a radical overhaul of the system. But we can take a solid step towards something better.

Importantly, this change is about process, not specific candidates or political/partisan affiliations. It’s about making the voting system work better. This initiative isn’t even about the next election—this is about reforming the system for the 2018 election. It’s not a fringe idea—it’s happening.

Lastly, it’s key to note that this change is about municipal elections in Toronto—how we elect our mayor, to start with—where we don’t have political parties, and it is not about voting at the provincial or federal levels.

Here’s a lengthier video of Mr. Meslin discussing ranked ballots with Steve Paikin on TVO:

[LINK]

Drawbacks

There are theoretical drawbacks to IRV—mostly in certain edge cases. Voting system nerds will smugly inform you about the catastrophic possibilities for ‘monotonicity failure’, at which point you should just nod as if you see their point, while inwardly rolling your eyes. 

Logistically, ranked ballots can get unwieldy if there are a lot of candidates. But I’m confident that a reasonable solution can be adopted in time for the mayoral election of 2018.

And lastly, certain reform advocates are vehemently against implementing IRV (or any other non-proportional system) for Toronto. I don’t find their tactics or arguments convincing—but readers would be well served to investigate further and come to their own conclusions.

IRV is flawed, but it’s better than what we have now (and to reiterate, some very learned people don’t agree).


Broad base of support

A wide base of support for IRV has developed throughout Toronto—across ideological lines.  The penultimate goal is to get >50% of councillors to endorse it, so that the process can get underway to prepare the 2018 municipal mayoral election for the change.


Find out more about Instant Runoff Voting


Disclosure

Last year I attended a RaBIT volunteer meeting. In that sense I have been indoctrinated by the polished, mellifluous words of Mr. Meslin, one of the key organizers. Although I signed up for a number of initiatives, I haven’t contributed any efforts to RaBIT beyond occasionally re-tweeting stuff. I’m out of the loop—one of those loafers who enjoys the idea of helping out...

Happy 179th, Toronto!

Happy birthday Toronto!

Image: the first page of the Act incorporating the City of Toronto, March 6, 1834
AN ACT, To extend the limits of the Town of York; to erect the said Town into a City; and to Incorporate it under the name of the City of Toronto.

It’s amusing how after a few lofty legal phrases the act gets down to business, authorizing the Commissioners of the Peace to 'appoint such days and hours for exposing to sale Butcher's meat, butter, eggs, poultry, fish and vegetables.'

Read the full act here. As far as I can tell, the first two and a half pages of the Act consist of a single, massive, run-on legal sentence.

Incidentally, Toronto sure was a lot smaller back then...

Toronto History Links and Resources

Toronto, Canada West
by Edwin Whitefield, 1854
There are numerous online resources that I’ve found extremely useful to have bookmarked, when researching aspects of Toronto history. This post will be an ongoing listing of those sites. I hope you’ll find these resources useful too!

Toronto Public Library: Digital Archive search
Globe and Mail online archive 1844-2009 (need TPL card)
Toronto Star online archive 1894-2009 (need TPL card)
Toronto Public Library: Historical resources by Neighbourhood
City of Toronto Archives: database image search
Archives of Ontario [click 'Archives Descriptive Database']
Library and Archives Canada: LAC search
Goad’s Atlas of the City of Toronto
Historical Maps of Toronto
Fort York and Garrison Common Maps
(Yes -- I know these are my own sites!)
List of Toronto City Directories (1833-1922 via Jane MacNamara)

Map resources

University of Toronto Map & Data Library
City of Toronto Archives
Toronto Public Library - Maps Collection

TPL guide to online map sources - a broad source list
City of Toronto maps (Contemporary)

Miscellaneous sites of interest

Vintage Toronto on Facebook
Toronto’s Historical Plaques
Lost Toronto - Superb collection of 'then and now' photos
Wholemaps.com - collection of photos by date, neighbourhood
Simcoe’s Gentry - Toronto’s Park Lots
fortyork.ca - Friends of Fort York
Transit Toronto
wherethestorytakesme - blog by Jane MacNamara
Toronto Then and Now Photographs - thread on urbantoronto.ca
Ontario Road Maps
Ontario War Memorials
Chuckman's Photos: Toronto Nostalgia

What Does A Decade of TTC Metropass Designs Look Like?

I once spent more than $14,000 to get around Toronto.

Granted, it was over the course of eleven years. And the whole time, I never once had to park, pay for gas or insurance, or change any flat tires.

How did I do it? Easy -- I took the TTC!

What a decade-plus -- and $14,000 -- of TTC Metropasses looks like.

A Collection of Monthly Passes

It’s a familiar routine: At the end of each month, I take my expired Metropass out of my wallet, and toss it into a pile at the back of my desk drawer.

I thought it would be fun to share what that pile looks like...

How the months roll by...

Visual Design -- Room for Improvement?

Many people like to moan and groan about the visual design of the Toronto Transit Commission Metropasses.

Are their complaints justified? Decide for yourself -- take a look at the passes below, and tell me what you think! I’ve grouped them chronologically into rough sets of similar design, and made a few comments about each set. (Sorry completists, my collection isn’t perfect--several months are missing, lost in my files or discarded.)

Pastel Flowers: December 2001-March 2004
Click any photo to expand and view larger
  • TTC passes were non-transferable and had to be presented along with a photo-ID. 
  • You had to write your name or TTC photo ID# on the space in the front. 
  • Months are abbreviated and spelled in capitals.
  • Check out the genuine 1970’s bubble font! (‘Metropass’)

Gradients: April 2004-Aug 2005
  • Bottom left: A blocky ‘A’ to denote an adult pass; bottom right: a repeated ‘adult’. The thing is, do you actually need the ‘A’ to distinguish it? You could just as easily leave the space blank -- and only mark Student/Senior passes.
  • The months are spelled out in faux-gold foil lowercase. 
  • Gradients, then eventually patterns are used for the background. 
  • The TTC logo appears twice, in colour and in gold.
  • These represent Kal Bedder’s first makeovers of the pass design (see article link near end of this post).

Patterns - September 2005-December 2006
  • In September 2005 Metropasses became transferable -- you could share your pass with someone else once your ride was complete. The wording gets tinkered with in January 2006, and again in November 2006. 
  • The Big A now appears on both corners.
  • I have heard the patterns described as ‘Corel PhotoPaint texture fills’ -- can anyone confirm?

Random Typefaces: January 2007-December 2007
  • The months are spelled out inside a dark bar at the bottom of the pass, using semi-random typefaces. Some of the months are painfully stretched -- oh, June! 
  • We’re back to the single A on the right with a thin black outline, and a single foil TTC logo. 
  • The non-kerning between the P and A of Metropass is especially glaring.
  • July and December are looking ready to party...

Pastel A & Photographs: January 2008-December 2008
  • Photographs are used as background images, using a floating angled rectangular mask. The scenes are TTC related, naturally. In later years art from various stations seems to become a theme. 
  • The ‘A’ gets moved to the left, now pastel-coloured with a white outline. ‘ADULT’ makes a reappearance.
  • Typefaces are again kind of random. What is that, Stencil for November?! Also it’s a matte gold as opposed to reflective.
  • ‘/ 08’ gets appended to the month line.

Vertical Pastel Bars: January 2009-June 2009
  • Order returns to the Metropass universe. Note the vertical bars and upright photographs. 
  • The ‘A’ goes back to white and gets the thin black outline again; we are informed these are ‘Adult Metropass’ cards.
  • Heavy counterfeiting of Metropasses occurred during this time period. And apparently counterfeiting is on the rise again.

Holographic Foil Stamp: July 2009-December 2010
  • The anti-counterfeiting holographic foil stamp appears. High-tech! 
  • The stamp, the ‘A’, and the photograph move around from month to month, along the middle third of the pass. (Though, the ‘A’ never gets the middle slot)
  • Those yellow ‘Only Valid if Removed’ stickers begin usage. Amusingly, underneath they have a transparent film with ‘Do not remove’ on it. (The stickers are applied this way so they can be easily removed but not reapplied -- they prevent pass-renting)
  • In August 2009 the TTC issued an RFI calling for original artwork to use on Metropasses. Allegedly passes were to use artwork by April 2010. But... did anything happen on that front? -- Can you tell the difference? As a sidenote, the political career of Adam Giambrone, the TTC Chair who was championing this initiative, was derailed in Feb. 2010 in the wake of a sex scandal. Perhaps that nixed the artwork idea, who knows?

  • Depending on the angle, the foil stamp shows a different TTC logo / crest. Um, no, the month doesn’t change! Haha.

Horizontal Bars: January 2011-October 2011
  • Thin horizontal bars slide across the middle. 
  • In August, the transparent ‘Do not remove’ film seems to have been... removed.
  • September turned out a bit garish, wouldn’t you say? Whoever was doing the work didn’t want to put a white outline around the TTC logo, I guess. (This would have enabled a red pass, with the text in white)

Cutting Corners: November 2011-December 2012
  • The TTC incorporates a small but useful bit of innovation for visually impaired users: the top left corner of each pass is clipped for easy orientation by feel. 
  • In January the month is moved to the left.
  • The foil now has different cuts or shapes for each month. What’s on the foil changed as well.
  • The graphic used for Dec 2011 is a crop of the one used for July 2011! C’mon, that’s lazy.

    Updates: Horizontal lines and solid colours: January 2013-December 2013
    • The background of the cards is now solid (in 2012 faint patterns were used)
    • Two horizontal lines with gradients enclose the 'A', holograph, and photo
    • The 'Valid for Month/Year Shown' text is deleted
    • Fans of TTC typography are happy to see that 'Metropass' uses the original TTC font. The month is also de-accentuated with a lighter typeface.
    • May 2013 repeats the graphic used in Sept 2012. Boo!

    Minor tweaks: January 2014-December 2014
    • The horizontal lines with gradients were removed
    • The TTC crest gets a bit larger and stays on the left
    • The (redundant) fine print ‘Adult’ under the A is removed
    • A black band (with the exception of June) near the bottom highlights the month and pass type
    • The pattern on the foil often changes involving variations of the TTC crest


    The Fine Print on the Back

    • I’d write about what changes occur, but the fine print is surprisingly effective at defeating my attentions. It just gives me a headache! 
    • Various TTC Chairs have deigned to put their name on passes, including: Brian Ashton, Betty Disero, Howard Moscoe, and Adam Giambrone. The current pass omits the present TTC Chair’s name.
    • ‘No Pass Backs’ as of September 2005.
    • As of January 2008, TTC passes could be claimed for a transit tax credit, so a space was made for signatures. 

      TTC Photo ID Card
      • Hahahaha. 
      • Up until August 2005, monthly pass users had to present a photo-ID along with the pass.
      • For me the typeface for ‘Metropass’ feels nostalgic and comfortable, rather than dated. It’s similar to how I feel about the phasing out of the maroon jackets.
      ‘Must be presented in an open and unrestricted manner’

      Criticism & Discussion: Who Cares?

      The Metropasses are ugly -- that’s the standard criticism I’ve come across. Fonts are haphazardly chosen, layouts are cluttered, the graphics are bland or unremarkable. The passes lack clarity.
      “It's an aesthetic thing. ... You carry this thing around for a month. It should look nice.”  
      - TTC spokesman Brad Ross Toronto Star, Aug. 14, 2009

      The TTC is a brand, and love it or loathe it, has an identity which connects many of us as Torontonians.

      Mediocre execution on something shared by almost half of all TTC customers speaks to a certain... indifference on the part of the mandarins of Davisville.

      Where is their passion and pride for this city we love? Shouldn’t we expect better? It invites larger questions about cohesion in presentation for the TTC as a whole -- observers have wryly noted that the TTC lacks consistency in its signage and branding.

      On the other hand, Metropasses are supposed to be utilitarian objects, not art. Over the long run they are ephemeral -- no-one secretly cherishes the disco-glory of December 2007. It’s not like someone’s going to collect them all (Er, hold on a sec...).

      I often imagine the TTC management mindset as, “We’re busy making the trains go. Typography and aesthetic flair is not a priority.”

      And I’m not entirely unsympathetic to that.

      If Metropasses were cool to look at and to collect, would it have any impact on usage or adoption rates (which would actually negatively impact the TTC, as revenue is lower from pass holders)?

      What if we put awesome archival photos on them? Or community-generated art? Or images of historical figures from Toronto’ past?

      Is there a better way we could celebrate Toronto transit?

      I wonder...

      Thanks for reading! Tell me what you think in the comments!

      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The Man To Blame (or Credit)

      I would love to ask Print and Electronic Information Supervisor Kal Bedder some of the above questions. He’s the TTC employee who is responsible (from 2004 to at least Jan. 2012) for the design of the passes. But I didn’t get around to it. And frankly, he’s probably got better things to do than field random questions from a gadfly blogger. Sorry!

      However, I did manage to discover an excellent interview with Bedder by Chris Berube for the Grid. The article sheds light on the production challenges and constraints on pass design due to security, bureaucracy, and a plethora of other requirements. If you’ve found this discussion of interest, I recommend a perusal.

      Has Bedder been successful in his choices? That’s up to you to judge...


      The Cost Calculation

      Aesthetic considerations notwithstanding, financially it’s been a great deal when you compare it to the cost of owning and operating a car.

      My TTC metropass cost calculation is an approximation only -- it uses the full retail adult prices, and does not take into account factors such as the Metropass Discount Plan, student or senior rates, Volume Incentive Programs, tax credits, municipal taxes, net present value of funds, opportunity costs, inflation, service interruptions, externalities, etc. Data source: Mike’s Transit Stop [update: this site is sadly defunct. But the data still exists on the Wayback Machine: click 'Update Archive', do a find for 'TTC Statistics', follow that link and then look for the item 'TTC Fares from 1954 to Present')


      Update
      This post was covered in the Summer 2013 issue of Spacing magazine. It tickled me to find myself opposite Steve Munro, the city’s wise luminary on transit matters. Click the image to read the article!

      ‘Evolution of the Metropass’ by Amber Daugherty in Spacing


      Further reading

      A History of TTC Fares (Transit Toronto article - also has a gallery of 1980s Metropasses)
      Test Drive a Metropass (Historicist article by Jamie Bradburn)
      Who Designs the TTC’s Fantastical Metropass? (The Grid article by Chris Berube)
      TTC Metropasses have evolved artistically (The Star  article about a year later by Graham Slaughter)


      Other Posts I’ve Done on Transit

      The Toronto Subway Song
      Parody Re-Mix of the TTC Union’s $1 Million Ad
      WITHOUT CAUSE - A Political Comedy
      Is this Accessibility?
      “Any Idiot Could Do This Job!”

      ps. Yes I know I should have put some effort into making a vibrant collage or pop-art arrangement. 

      Please ‘Like’ and Share this post with other transit enthusiasts!

      Where the Money Goes, & Where It Comes From: City of Toronto Operating Budget

      A broad diversity of opinions exists regarding how the City of Toronto should spend its money. Everyone has their own ideas about services that deserve more funding, or that ought to be cut to the bone.

      When having these discussions, it’s productive to glance at how the city operating budget (currently proposed at $9.42 billion) breaks down, to serve as a reference point. You might be surprised at how much -- or how little -- some departments actually receive.

      How We Spend the Money, & Where It Comes From


      Where the money goes:
      Expenditures, 2013 City of Toronto Operating Budget [source]
      (Click images to view larger)

      Where the money comes from:
      Revenue Sources, 2013 City of Toronto Operating Budget 

      [My own pet cause is the Toronto Public Library, which handles a higher circulation per capita than any other public library system in the world, for not even two cents of your taxpayer dollar.

      Some of my techie compatriots mistakenly think that libraries are increasingly obsolete in an interconnected digital world -- but the reality is, demand for library services has never been greater.

      I’d also mention Heritage Toronto, but in truth the level of funding here is basically a joke. Want to guess what the total program expenditure for this department is? For the entire city of Toronto? $740k. Yeah. On the chart above I believe it gets lumped in unceremoniously with ‘Other’.]

      Take some time to read more about the City of Toronto’s operating budget, so that you can have an informed discussion about it:
      2013 Operating Budget Presentation (proposed -- pdf)
      2013 Operating Budget Analyst Notes

      The analyst notes for specific agencies (e.g. the Toronto Zoo) can be quite intriguing... Deliberations and debate will take place in council over the next few months, with a final vote in January.

      What are your budget priorities? Should we be spending more, or less -- and on what services?