Fort York Citizenship Ceremony: a Moving Experience

Last week I was invited by the Institute for Canadian Citizenship to participate as a Roundtable Discussion Facilitator as part of their twice-yearly Building Citizenship program at Fort York.

It’s a unique initiative that deserves attention. Just prior to their Citizenship Ceremony, new Canadians are introduced to existing citizens for a welcoming discussion reflecting on what it means to be Canadian.

‘What does it mean for you to be here today?’ 

I found the experience quite rewarding. I was born in Canada, and I take a lot of things about citizenship for granted. In this day and age, it is easy to become jaded or even wary about thoughtless patriotism.

Listening to the backgrounds and stories of the new Canadians was meaningful—these are people that have, with great deliberation, chosen to make this country their home. They’ve uprooted their lives, spent years going through the process, and have fully committed themselves to becoming Canadian and part of our community.

Reflecting on their journeys has given me a deeper appreciation for the simple freedoms (and responsibilities) we have in Canada.

The Judge presiding over the Ceremony

Every natural-born Canadian should witness at least one Citizenship Ceremony. It’s a solemn but joyous affair.

Highlights for me included:
  • Affirming the oath of citizenship (yes, it does require you to pledge allegiance to the Queen)
  • Hearing 40 newly-minted Canadians singing ‘O Canada’ — an emotionally charged moment
  • Enjoying a thoughtful lecture by Wayne Reeves, Chief Curator of Museums and Heritage Services for the City of Toronto, on the meaning of Remembrance Day in the context of Fort York. 

The strength of a nation lies in its people, and I’m proud to say we became 40 stronger last week.

40 new Canadians swearing the oath of Citizenship
Hearty first meal provided by The Meeting Place/West Neighbourhood House

The Institute, founded and co-chaired by the Rt. Hon. Adrienne Clarkson and John Ralston Saul, also runs the well-regarded Cultural Access Pass program, which provides new citizens with free access to more than 1,000 Canadian places and spaces (museums, parks, etc.) 

All told, it was an excellent learning opportunity and I’m fortunate to have observed this important, intimate moment in the lives of 40 citizens. I was also pleased to see the new Fort York Visitor Centre in use—exactly the sort of community event for which it was built. My thanks to the ICC for the invitation.

Photos in this post courtesy of Lambrina Nikolaou.

Heritage Toronto Award: Historical Maps of Toronto

I am the delighted recipient of the 2014 Heritage Toronto Award of Merit (Media category) for my site, Historical Maps of Toronto.

Gee, I’ve always wanted... Rob Ford’s signature?!

The Award was presented to me at last evening’s 40th Annual Heritage Toronto Awards at Koerner Hall. It pleases me considerably to see that Torontonians are using the site as a research resource on a regular basis.

Receiving the award from Alexandra Pike, Heritage Toronto Board Chair

The full list of people I have to thank is extensive, but luckily I’ve already written it up (scroll down to ‘Thanks and Acknowledgments’). Carrie Martin, Elise Paradis, Stephen Otto, and anyone who ‘bought me coffee’: thank you so much for your support.

Historical maps are like a series of snapshots in time. They illustrate the fascinating story of Toronto’s evolution from a compact town a little over two hundred years ago, into the bustling metropolis we know today. Rich in informative detail, yet often overlooked, they lend us a proper sense of context, and of place. They are powerful artifacts which capture Toronto’s defining tension: the ever-present impetus for change, pushing against the influence of what came before.

It is my pleasure to share them with the rest of Toronto—because history belongs to all of us.

If you’re into old maps or the history of early Toronto, I invite you to visit Historical Maps of Toronto, as well as its sister site Fort York and Garrison Common Maps.

Minimalist TTC Subway Map

“Arriving at Bloor, Bloor Station...”

TTC subway map on Toronto Rocket, with cover removed

While travelling on the Yonge line, I happened to notice the LED route map on the Toronto Rocket train I was riding was missing its cover (by the way: this is not cool, guys. If you want a genuine subway map, purchase a ‘classic T1’ map for just $10 via the TTC. Stealing one for your dorm room is lame).

Scrutinizing the map more closely, we can see that it’s already set to handle the upcoming Spadina line extension stations (diagonal line of dots, upper left), whenever they open. No reconfiguration needed, except changing the cover. As for the proposed Scarborough subway...

The Fort York Visitor Centre: An Important Step Forward

The Fort York Visitor Centre is about to open. It is a marvellous accomplishment.

The Fort York Visitor Centre: in harmony with its surroundings

Decades (literally!) of patient, persistent work, wrangling, and planning went into making the Visitor Centre a reality. A generation of stakeholders and all levels of government have been involved.

The Fort has been an oft-forgotten, sometimes neglected gem in the heart of the city, but the Visitor Centre marks an important step forward in the evolution and life of the Fort.

The Visitor Centre is a clean, elegant, low-slung building that somehow manages the trick of bringing solemnity to the underside of the Gardiner Expressway. It was designed by Patkau Architects Inc. / Kearns Mancini Architects Inc. and has already won awards.

On duty at the Visitor Centre entrance

I’m one of those fusty stick-in-the-mud types who are highly resistant to change, and I was anxious that the Visitor Centre might turn out to be an over-expressive architectural carbuncle drawing attention away from the actual historic site.

Not to worry.

The Fort now has a world-class facility with which to welcome visitors and provide context for the history of Toronto, as well as host events and exhibits. It’s part of an overall vision that recognizes that the Fort and the accompanying Garrison Common are an integral part of the community and have a participatory role to play.

Beautiful, functional gallery space 

Inside, the Visitor Centre seems well-laid out, and I look forward to seeing how the space is used by different exhibits. The Immersive Ramp on the upper level is particularly intriguing; I want to see how it develops.

On display at the moment (in addition to materials relating to the First World War) is a donation of 11 paintings inspired by the War of 1812 by noted artist Charles Pachter (if you’ve been to College subway station, you’ve seen his handiwork).

Thirst for Victory, by Charles Pachter
City of Toronto Museums, A14-33

The Fort York Visitor Centre is celebrating its opening this weekend with the On Common Ground Festival. Check it out!

Get Fortified!

p.s. while you’re in the neighbourhood, be sure to drop in to the recently opened 99th branch of the Toronto Public Library, the Fort York branch on Bathurst.

Fort York branch of the TPL

Further reading:


Full disclosure: the Friends of Fort York and I collaborate together on the website, Fort York and Garrison Common Maps.

5 Years Down, About 20 To Go: My Quest For A Peace Tower Canadian Flag

Did you know that Canadian citizens can submit a written request for flags that have flown atop Parliament Hill?

Photo: Canadian Flag flying on Parliament Hill, Ottawa
Would you like to own a Parliament Hill Canadian flag? Just ask!
Photo courtesy: PWGS

It’s a popular wait-list — the approximate waiting period is currently 42 years for a Peace Tower flag, and 31 years for East and West Block flags. The Peace Tower flag is changed daily, and never serves another official purpose after its flight.

I sent in my request about five years ago, when the Peace Tower list was shorter. A little over five thousand Canadians are in the queue ahead of me.

The Ministry of Public Works and Government Services administers the program, which started in the mid-1990s.

Only a couple more decades to go!


Celebrating My Candy Crush Dominion

I have a confession to make. It’s a little embarrassing.

But sometimes it’s more entertaining to just blurt things out, even if it gets awkward.

I’ll express it in pictorial form:


Yup. In case you don’t recognize that middle graphic, it’s an in-game relative standing progress chart: I am the top Candy Crush player of all my friends.

It has taken me 9 months of desultory play to achieve this dubious distinction, woven from the interstitial pauses of transit commutes, laundry loads, and grocery lines.

I have survived the horror of level 578. Emerged resilient and unbowed from the frustration of level 461. Endured and somehow vanquished level 350. I am a Candy Crush King!

My sincerest apologies to any Facebook connections I spammed along the way, inadvertently or otherwise. Your forbearance is admirable.

Candy Crush Saga Level 461: Indelibly frustrating

I’m fascinated by the mechanics that make Candy Crush so popular.

And it definitely is popular. Boasting over 46 million average monthly players on Facebook, Candy Crush Saga has also been installed over 500 million times across iOS and Android devices. It’s played by men, women and children of all ages, exhibiting a uniquely broad appeal that most video games lack.

As with anything that becomes so widespread that it seeps into the culture, many people outwardly profess an attitude of scorn and derision towards the game. Certainly it is a time-waster. But vast rewards have accrued for its British maker, King.com Ltd. According to ThinkGaming, the game’s daily revenues are currently just shy of $1 million — for the US section of the iOS App Store alone.

I’ve been tempted many times to join that throng of paying rubes.The gameplay is transparently designed to provoke and beguile players into purchasing extra moves and game boosters. But as King notes in their FAQ, the entire game can also be completed without any purchases. My miserly nature (and yes, my ornery stubbornness) has enabled me to resist—thus far.

Mr. Toffee (left) and the main protagonist, Tiffi (short for Toffette)

How I First Got My Sugar Crush
Kat, this is all your fault.

My friend Kat introduced me to this saccharine diversion. We were riding the subway home after a climbing session, and she started playing with her cellphone.

“What’s that?” I asked her.

“Just a silly game. It’s called Candy Crush.”

That night, I googled the name and came across this Slate article describing the game’s addictive qualities. Like other match-three puzzle games before it (Bejewelled comes to mind), Candy Crush features straightforward play that begins simply, and progressively gets harder as you complete more levels.

The social integration is devilish, and though I am loathe to admit it, the system hooked me almost instantly: In addition to fielding periodic exhortations to share and like the game, users can observe where they stand in relation to their peers.

Colour bomb! Delicious.
This was my first exposure to such cunning psychological manipulation (I don’t normally play video games), and my competitive instinct was led astray far too easily.

While I was initially taken aback by the number of my Facebook connections who indulge — I had expected close to zero — soon I was right there among them, vying feverishly to complete “just one more sweet level.”

It turns out there is a disproportionate thrill to be had from catching up to, and then passing people you know. Nevermind the game’s lack of sophistication or its gaudy, childish presentation — it’s fun.

Final Thoughts
I’m going to savour this absurd moment, however fleeting it may be, where I am demonstrably the... best? at this endeavour.

Yes, it’s a stupid game, a leisure-time opiate of distraction. But I’ve enjoyed playing it. It relaxes me. At time of writing, I’ve only got about 30 levels left; King periodically releases new levels. Then I’ll be done, and I can start reading Shakespeare again in my spare time. [Note: see update below]

Yeah, right.

I cannot recommend that you try it for yourself. It’s far too much of a time-waster. But should you decide after all to challenge me for the Kingship of Candy Crush — I’ll see you in nine months.

Update
It’s official. I’ve completed all of the regular Candy Crush levels that have been created. I can now relax!

I’m done!! Until they make more levels, that is.

Setting Easy for Summer Sweatfest Wasn't So Easy!

I recently had the diverting experience of assisting the setting crew for the initial competition in this year’s Summer Sweat Fest bouldering series. The opener was held at The Rock Oasis, my home gym.

My first time setting problems for a bouldering comp!

I learned that setting for a competition—even a casual one like Sweat Fest—is a lot of work, and harder than I imagined. Comp routesetters: you have my newfound respect!

Often when you read (or watch videos) about cool boulder problems that people have made, the focus is on hard movement through advanced sequences—so I thought I’d write a somewhat unstructured piece regarding the other end of things, and relate my first-time personal experience of trying to set easier and moderate problems, in the context of a comp.

The head-setters were Adam Tataryn and Adrian Das (both professional setters), and we were joined by Dave Machado (another ‘recreational’ setter like myself). The way it shook out, I wound up authoring a modest chunk of the beginner and intermediate grade problems, which freed the other fellows to focus primarily on the Open category and advanced scramble-format problems.

An Emphasis on Fun
It’s important to note that with Sweat Fest the emphasis is on a friendly bouldering series, with beginners and youth encouraged to participate. Other themes would be low cost, informality, and the general aim of fun.

There were 26 scramble-format problems, numbered in roughly ascending difficulty (e.g. 1 was the easiest, 2 a little harder, etc.) (There were also 5 Open problems each for Men and Women).

The challenge was, how do you set problems which beginners find stimulating, but without being frustrating or too difficult? And at the same time you can’t just let the intermediate climbers cakewalk through your problems either.

It was a learning experience for me—it was my first time ever setting for a comp. The most apparent lesson is that I’m still figuring out how to properly set at a given grade.

My problems tend to favour movements that I personally find entertaining, or that I’m trying to improve on. I had to continually remind myself (and occasionally be reminded) that I was setting for newer, moderately skilled climbers, and youth.

This meant: You can’t make moves too hard. You can’t make moves too long or out of reach. You have to take into account a lack of technique. You have to make it extra safe.

Following are a few of the problems I set (bear in mind this is only a small subset of the comp). I’ll briefly discuss my intent versus how it turned out.

#8 - Yellow (click images to view larger)
This short V1 requires calm, deliberate movement. Despite the brevity, the volumes give the route a curiously exposed feeling; the hand holds are tolerable, but not overly good, pinches that you have to negotiate with.

We turned the start and middle holds so they were easier to use. I wanted to create a longer problem with more moves, but at that skill level I didn’t want the finish to be over either of the two volumes, in case of a fall. So it wound up being quite brief. Perhaps I could have put a couple of easy traverse moves leftwards at the top.

#10 - Purple
I was happiest with #10. It has two distinct playful movements. The first involves stepping up onto the red volume and balancing on it with no hands. The second move is leaning left from that balanced position until you 'fall' onto the next hold. Both involve the climber doing something coordinated, a bit out of the regular.

The start hold (on the green volume) was added to prevent the climber from skipping the above sequence and grabbing the left hold immediately. Instead, most people will step up on the red volume from the right side, leading into the balance position. I was delighted to watch people get on, reach out left, then realize they had to leave the safety of the start hold and balance on the red volume, exactly the way I had imagined it.

I added two left side footholds for the 2nd half. Originally I wanted to make the climber smear up but it proved too challenging for the grade range we wanted to use it in.

#5 - Green
This simple problem caused me headaches, believe it or not. I wanted to set an easy (V0) overhanging problem. The challenge is that most beginners are not strong enough to do much on an overhang.

I put up the biggest, juggiest holds I could find — and it was still too hard. Then we substituted in the big hold in the middle, adjusted a few angles to be smoother, and that solved it; the problem became doable for novices.

I also couldn’t make the problem too lengthy, again because most beginners haven’t the endurance to deal with an extended overhang. So the problem peters out after not going anywhere exciting. If it were twice as long, it would make for a nice warmup.

During the comp I watched this problem specifically, and was gratified to see climbers on it, sometimes falling off, but ultimately mostly completing it.

#19 - Yellow (green tape)
The blue volume is the highlight of this V3. (Though if you’re short like me you have to fight with the opposing vertical holds, also some good work. I should have moved the start hold further right to force this for everyone)

You have to wrestle with the volume to get to the end. Adrian and Adam removed a foothold I originally placed under the volume. It was an excellent tweak, and really forces the climber to deal with the volume. Thematically the end is like the reverse direction of the Women’s Open problem (pink holds) shown in the same photo.

The tail end of #16 - Grey/Black (beginning not shown)
#16 (about a V3) has a pleasurable sequence at the end where you have to use the (left) triangle volume in a couple of different ways. Approaching from the left, you pull on the spine of the volume as if it was a big hold, moving your feet from the small knob below it (in the yellow paint) to the next foothold out and up to the right. Then you move forcefully upwards into a double gaston, which you must maintain as you shift your body right in order to high-step the left foot onto the side of the volume. After establishing both feet on the side, launch for the finish.

I had originally made the top of the wall the end, but then we moved it down and used a nice soft finishing hold.

#20 - Blue
This one qualitatively turned out very different from what I intended! I wanted to set an elegant, somewhat beta-intensive problem where the climber has to thoughtfully push and pull the corner, in order to get around it.

Instead it climbs very messy and a tad sketchy. The lower hold on the corner is slick and slippery, a real pain to deal with first as a handhold going left around the corner, and then a couple moves later as a foothold when you come back right for the finish.

An ugly problem, but it served its purpose.

Final Thoughts
In general, I had a tough time relaxing and ‘setting loose’. I felt overly self-conscious about balancing the tension of keeping the grading consistent, versus spicing things up. I had to tone down several of the problems because I would lose sight of the audience who would be climbing them. And the pressure of setting in quantity within a given timeframe unnerved me. Although I’m happy with the overall end results, I felt that a couple of my problems (not shown) perhaps leaned towards the mundane, and in that sense I was not entirely satisfied with the expression of my creativity. I was glad that the other setters were there to worry about ‘the big picture’ of where problems fit into the context of the overall competition.

The comp turned out great—there was a solid turnout, and people enjoyed themselves. Crucially (to me, at least), people got on my problems! And within the more-modestly-skilled set of competitors, the problems didn’t all get sent on the first try, nor did they frustrate and bedevil everyone. I saw smiles!

So it was a decent mix.

I want climbers to get something out of the problems, to feel like they’ve accomplished something at the end, that they’ve had to apply their mind and bodies to solve the puzzle.

Big thanks to The Rock Oasis and Karen McGilvray for the unexpected invitation to participate—I had a fantastic time. Thanks to Adam and Adrian for their thoughtful advice and direction, their trust and patience with my setting and questions, and to Don Williams and Dave for forerunning with me. I enjoyed myself.

The problems from the comp are all still up at Oasis, so by all means go and check them out! They’re a lot of fun.

Other Climbing Posts I’ve Written (recent or otherwise)
Hub Climbing in Markham: a great bouldering experience
What is it like to Judge an IFSC Bouldering World Cup?
Why is Tree Climbing Illegal in Toronto?
The Secret Life of Iyma Lamarche, Rock Climber
Hurrah For The Ontario Access Coalition

Goodbye to The Grid (and Eye Weekly)

I’m sad to learn that The Grid is ceasing operations.


A free alt-weekly competitor to NOW magazine here in Toronto, The Grid was published by Torstar Corp. (Star Media Group) and was the reincarnation of Eye Weekly. Launched three years ago with a complete rebrand and redesign, The Grid won numerous awards for journalism and design.

The Grid is no more. I’ll miss it.

By nature I am curmudgeonly; I generally dislike change and am stubbornly resistant to publication revamps.

But The Grid won me over with quality. It was a smart, brisk—and generally positive—take on what was happening in the city. I enjoyed reading every issue, and it’s unfortunate in this age of new media and declining ad revenues that their business model no longer supported continued publication.

Lively local journalism.

Best of luck to all the staff who have lost their jobs with this announcement. I wonder what happens to the online archives of past issues?

Further reading
Torstar's weekly magazine The Grid to cease publication - G&M
The Grid weekly magazine is closing - Toronto Star
Eye Weekly/The Grid, 1991–2014 - Torontoist
The Grid R.I.P. - Michael Barclay

Hub Climbing in Markham: a great bouldering experience

Yours truly on the Dragon, an
overhanging feature above a foam pit
I’m feeling thrashed today.

Yesterday I had the pleasure — and I use that word deliberately — of attending the opening of Hub Climbing, purportedly offering the largest amount of indoor bouldering terrain in Canada.

My friend Yumi and I had a blast. There’s simply a lot of bouldering available, at all difficulty levels — so whether you’re a beginner, intermediate, or advanced climber you’ll find plenty to engage you.

I was singularly impressed by the facility. Maybe it was the brand new holds, the shiny Walltopia surface, the reassuring thick double padding, or the bright lighting, but I think the Hub is a fantastic new addition for the local climbing community in the GTA area.

One wall was reserved for 'World Cup'-style comp problems.
Of the 6, I was able to top these three. I could only do the ‘intermediate’
versions of 2 of the remaining 3. Need to get stronger! 

The sheer amount of wall surface available for bouldering is lovely. A friend of mine pointed out that for shorter walls & bouldering, instead of spending money building up, you’re spending the money on building out. It allows the gym to set problems by colour (instead of the more common taping), which gives a very clean and aesthetic presentation.

Setting by colour: clean presentation. There’s more than 1 arch at the Hub!
Photo via The Hub Facebook page.

I have ambivalent feelings about this; taping gives you the widest universe of holds to choose from, and allows for density, but invariably looks messy; whereas setting by colour looks great, but then your problems tend to be thematically driven by the sets of holds that are acquired, i.e. a sloper set, a pinch set, etc.

Variety for everyone. These photos don’t really capture the scope of the place

I enjoyed the topping out. A couple of the finishes felt a touch committing, but it was always on an advanced problem, so if you got to that point you undoubtedly had the skills to properly assess the situation. One of the top out areas has a slide for you to get back to ground level. It was an amusing touch, though I’d still prefer a downclimb option.

The grading was... inconsistent. But it’s completely unfair to make judgments on opening day; an assessment six months from now, once they’ve established a flow, will give a better idea of the grading. More importantly, the setting was fun, independent of the ratings.

As a boulderer, I don’t think I’d bother bringing a harness to do routes at the Hub, if only because of the wealth of bouldering available. The route section seems more set up for beginners and to cycle through birthday parties, schoolgroups, and corporate events—which is nice because then you kind of have a subtle distinction in areas and don’t have to worry as much about keeping watch for complete beginners in your fall zone. Additional areas for yoga and weight training are planned but haven’t been built out yet.

Early birds lining up for the opening. Yes that’s
me being an enthusiastic goof at the back.
Photo via The Hub Instagram account.

I had a chance to briefly speak to each of the three owners, Yoav, Rob and Steven. I also met Max Summerlee the gym GM & head routesetter. Getting the gym built was a lengthy process of location selection, design planning, engineering, permit wrangling, and logistics, and you could tell from their faces it has been a rewarding if tiring journey to get to this juncture. They should be commended on their accomplishment.

If you live in downtown Toronto and you don’t have a car, it’s a serious trek to get there. You’ll want to budget a couple of hours.

We took the subway to Victoria Park station, the 24 Victoria Park bus up to Victoria Park and Steeles, and then leisurely cycled north up Woodbine for about twenty five minutes until we arrived at the gym, just past Highway 7. At some point I’ll try going to Finch station and using the 53 Steeles East bus instead.

Lastly, for those of you who care about this sort of thing, the washrooms and changerooms were compact but clean.

Congratulations to the Hub for their amazing, well-organized launch — for a day one opening, the attention to detail was superb. Even though it’s too far for me to attend regularly, I’m excited about the opening of what promises to be an excellent bouldering facility. I strongly recommend checking it out; it’s absolutely worth a visit.

Hub Climbing is located at 165 Macintosh Drive in Markham.

ps. Thanks to Max for getting us into an unused slot on the popular Dragon feature! That brought a huge smile to our faces.

MaRS: Draw your own conclusions

I’ve been following the recent media coverage of the MaRS debacle with interest. As a heritage enthusiast I applauded the melding of the old Toronto General Hospital structure with the new facility, but I was always puzzled by the space’s emptiness.

MaRS from College. Photo: Christie Spicoluk. CC BY-SA 3.0

If you’ve ever wandered inside to take a look around, it has never seemed like a particularly vibrant community existed there, and I wondered why a technology startup would find it welcoming.

Here are a number of articles to bring you up to speed:

Have you had any experience with MaRS?

What is it like to Judge an IFSC Bouldering World Cup?

Ready to judge at the 2014
Toronto IFSC Bouldering
World Cup. Boy do I need a haircut!
This weekend I had the privilege of serving on the judging team for the 2014 Toronto IFSC Bouldering World Cup, held at Gravity Climbing Gym in Hamilton. You can occasionally glimpse me in the footage!

I’ve judged at a number of local Tour de Bloc, Summer Sweatfest, and OCF Youth bouldering competitions, so I’ve got reasonable confidence in my judging ability—but nevertheless leading up to the event I felt nervous.

What if I made a mistake and embarrassed my community? Literally some of the best competition climbers in the world were in attendance. Ideally, you avoid making any obviously wrong calls—yet it can happen that you make the right call, and it still generates a controversy.

The night before, the judging team met with IFSC Jury President Johannes Altner, Head Judge Paul Leday and IFSC Technical Rep Graeme Alderson. We reviewed the rules and format for the event, and the expectations for our performance. Every bouldering problem had 2 judges, so there was always a second pair of eyes watching each competitor in case the first person missed something.

My official Judge’s badge: I’m legit!

I was assigned to judge Men’s 2 during the qualifiers and Men’s 1 for the semi-finals. It was thrilling to be able to witness some of the world’s elite climbers working on a problem right in front of me.

Technically as officials we’re not supposed to cheer for the athletes, but it was kind of difficult not to feel the enthusiasm of the raucous crowd watching behind me.

Rustam Gelmanov shows his mettle: an anecdote
Part of the reward for serving as a judge is that you get an up close view of the athletes. Allow me to digress briefly:

Rustam Gelmanov eyes
Semi Finals Problem 1
I got a peek into the mental resilience of Rustam Gelmanov from Russia, during the semi-finals round. I’ve always been astonished by his ability; his climbing often features totally different movements that are enabled by his incredible strength.

However, for whatever reason he was shut down by the first problem, which I was judging. Every other semi-finalist was able to make at least the bonus hold, so I could hardly believe my eyes when Gelmanov kept trying and failing to make the first move on it.

I could tell he was frustrated. A lot of people would be thrown off by this initial defeat, and would have a disastrous performance after. Not being able to complete the first problem put huge pressure on him.

And yet — what did he do next? He reeled off tops on the three remaining semi-final problems, and proceeded to Finals. Truly impressive, and perhaps something to learn from for my own climbing.

No serious incidents; one appeal
As it turned out, my problems were easy to officiate — clear starts, straightforward bonus holds, and we didn’t experience any time-completion issues.

On Semi-Finals Women’s 4, my fellow arbiter Rolly Magno made a call that was appealed—the outcome of which would have affected who made it into Finals.

Rolly ruled that Anna Stöhr—last year’s defending World Cup bouldering champion—had not achieved the bonus on the problem. The Austrian team appealed that decision, and upon video review, lost.  The appeal is mentioned right at the end of the semi-finals commentary.

Defending Champion Anna Stöhr prepares to climb

Watch Stöhr’s attempt and assess it for yourself. She touches the bonus, but does not control it. Per the IFSC rules,
The Bonus Hold shall be considered as “controlled” where a competitor has made use of the hold to achieve a stable or controlled position.
If Stöhr had achieved the bonus, she would have made it into Finals. As it turned out she didn’t, and so 16 year-old Julija Kruder from Slovenia got to compete in her first ever World Cup Final. And Rolly was fairly pleased with himself.

A memorable show
It was fantastic to see so many top-level boulderers in person. Shauna Coxsey! Sean McColl! Juliane Wurm! Alex Puccio! Jan Hojer! Rustam Gelmanov! Kilian Fischhuber! etc.

Congratulations to Akiyo Noguchi and Guillaume Glairon Mondet on their hard-earned victories (and to Sean McColl for his bronze medal finish).

I hope that they enjoyed their time here and will return to compete again.

It was also so exciting and filled us with pride to witness the Canadian team climbing with everything they had. You guys are amazing! Lucas Uchida, we’re watching you...

Thanks very much to Lorraine Winger, the Volunteer Coordinator; Luigi Montilla, the Bouldering Canada Director; and Julia Bonnell. I sincerely appreciated this opportunity to participate. Organizing and executing a complex event at this level and scope requires enormous effort and skill; everyone involved should be pleased with the outcome.

Thanks to Gravity, my fellow volunteers, and the event sponsors. And thanks to all the climbers for putting on such a memorable show!

Results & Video
Full results: Women | Men. Gripped recap.

Semi-Finals: (climbing starts about 9 minutes in)


Link

Finals (climbing starts about 30 minutes in):

Link

Bonus: Chief Routesetter Chris Danielson discusses the Finals problems
Link


Other Climbing Posts I’ve written
IFSC Bouldering World Cup in Hamilton a success (recap from last year)
Why is Tree Climbing Illegal in Toronto?
The Secret Life of Iyma Lamarche, Rock Climber
Hurrah For The Ontario Access Coalition
Interview with Rock Oasis' Founder and President


Disappointment as Bill 166 is dead

Alas, the upcoming provincial election has killed Bill 166, the Toronto Ranked Ballot Elections Act. All outstanding pieces of legislation go back to the drawing board; Bill 166 made it through two readings and public hearings had been scheduled, but that’s not enough unfortunately.

It’s a setback. However, patience has been a hallmark of the Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto, and I’m confident that the push for ranked ballots will continue afresh after the provincial election.

See previously
Another step closer to making Ranked Ballots a reality in Toronto
Why I Support the Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto (And Why You Should, Too!)

Another step closer to making Ranked Ballots a reality in Toronto

Democracy in Toronto took another important step forward yesterday, as MPP Mitzie Hunter’s private member’s bill empowering Toronto to set up a ranked ballot system for municipal elections passed through second reading, and was sent to the Ontario legislature’s Standing Committee on Social Policy for further study.


LINK: Mitzie Hunter Statement re RaBIT (Ranked Ballot Initiative)

The bill still has a long way to go (see How an Ontario Bill becomes Law; and even then Toronto City Council will still have to vote to adopt such a system), but the volunteers behind the Ranked Ballot Initiative of Toronto should take a day or two to celebrate this key milestone.

Pushing through any electoral reform is a daunting prospect filled with hurdles. I’m truly impressed by the progress that has been made so far by RaBIT to get it to this stage.

It requires a real persistence, focus, and sense of civic dedication to patiently manoeuvre a change like this through the different layers of government and community, over the course of several years. I would compare the process to walking a tightrope in slow motion. Each delicate step is vital, and at any point the whole thing could be derailed.

Keep at it, RaBIT! Follow the progress of Bill 166 here.

See previously:

Come to my PodCamp talk on Maps and Digital History!

This Sunday afternoon I’m giving a talk at PodCamp Toronto, a community-driven technology ‘unconference’.

Come to my talk at PodCamp Toronto! It’s free!

I’ll be discussing my Historical Maps of Toronto project as an informal case study. We’ll cover maps in general, digital history, and challenges overcome in the course of the project.

You’re cordially invited to come! My talk is this Sunday, February 23 at 2pm, in the Rogers Communications Centre - 80 Gould St.

The event is free to attend and is taking place at Ryerson University over the course of this weekend. Be sure to check out the full schedule of speakers and sessions—it promises to be a fun time. More about PodCamp Toronto here.

See you there!

You’ll Love Exploring Toronto From 1818 To 2012 With This Amazing Interactive Map. Check Out 1947!

Apologies for the Buzzfeed-style headline, but this is a project I want to share widely. You’ll enjoy it, I promise.

Toronto Historic Map viewer—an interactive online map

Click to launch the Toronto Historic Maps viewer by Chris Olsen.

Easily pan around (Google-maps style), zoom in and out, and best of all—switch between years to watch how the city evolves over time. For optimal results, use a decent computer with a modern browser and a fast internet connection. Requires Flash (sorry), and may take a few seconds to initially load.

Background context
Over the last couple of years, I put together several online projects relating to historical maps of Toronto. A key motivation was to aggregate maps from different institutional sources, as previously they were difficult to discover, navigate and browse. My hope was to provide a simple, easy-to-use entry point for researchers, students, and other Toronto history enthusiasts to access these important documents from our past. 

To my delight, another aficionado with a passion for maps recently leveraged that work to create something new and marvellous. This is what happens with shared historical information and open data—everyone benefits.

In my blog post about Goad’s Atlas of the City of Toronto—Online!, I challenged readers to “imagine a jazzed-up, interactive version, or a gigantic ‘all in one file’ image carefully stitched together”.

That line apparently resonated with Chris Olsen, an analyst at ESRI (the premier Geographical Information System technology vendor), and he nimbly took up my challenge.

Olsen had previously created well-received historical map viewers for Cleveland and Pittsburgh. He learned of my Goad and Historical Maps of Toronto projects, and decided to implement a map viewer instance for Toronto, seeing as the source images had conveniently been assembled in one spot by yours truly.

The amount of work he invested is prodigious. To create the site, Olsen georeferenced and then melded together map plates from the Goad fire insurance plans (1880, 1889, 1913 and 1924). He also incorporated maps from 1818, 1842, and aerial photographs from 1947. At my urging he added the 1858 Boulton Atlas of the City of Toronto (a predecessor map to the Goad plans). I’ve contacted the City of Toronto Archives to find out if we can obtain the source imagery for some of their post-1947 aerial photography series so they can be added to the project (No response yet, but we’ll see what happens).

photo: Old Fort York as seen by plane in 1947
Recognize this famous Toronto landmark?

[Note to techies: Yes, Olsen’s georeferenced files are public and free to use. Depending on the application, users can access them in ArcMap by connecting here, or if within a web application, here.]

I have often envisioned doing something like this, but was stymied by the technical and resource requirements to get it together. I’m incredibly happy that someone else felt the same way—and actually did something about it.

The value in this project is the ability to scrutinize how Toronto buildings, neighbourhoods and streetscapes change between years. Even in the gap between 1947 and 2012, the differences—as well as the things that stay the same—can be astonishing.

Mr. Olsen is to be thanked for gifting us with this engrossing and novel way of exploring old Toronto. It pleases me to have contributed (even if merely peripherally) to his endeavour. This sort of initiative is exactly why organizing the maps together was so important to me in the first place—it enables people to find, use, and build on the resources in new and exciting ways. History belongs to all of us!

Readers, let me know in the comments if you discover anything neat. I know you will.

See Also
Historical Maps of Toronto
Goad’s Atlas of the City of Toronto—Online!
Fort York and Garrison Common Maps

Forcing Unicyclists Onto the Road is a Bad Idea

Open Letter

Attention: Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong (Chair), Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, Councillor Janet Davis, Councillor Mark Grimes, Councillor Mike Layton, & Councillor John Parker

To the esteemed members of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:

Don’t force me
to ride on the road!
I am writing with respect to City of Toronto PWIC agenda item PW28.2, Electric Bikes - Proposed Policies and By-laws.

The proposal before the Committee revises the municipal definition of “bicycle” to include unicycles. An unintentional side effect of this change will be to force unicyclists to ride on the road with other vehicles. This is problematic. I strongly recommend that the Public Works Committee remove unicycles from the updated bicycle definition.


Forcing unicycles onto the road is a bad idea

There are two major issues with the proposed revision: 
  1. Unicycles have just one wheel. Bicycles, by any reasonable etymological examination of the term, have two.

    Imprecision and terminological inexactitude are key factors affecting bylaw enforcement, which led to the e-bike policy review in the first place. A self-contradictory definition impedes the goal of bylaw clarity.

  2. More seriously, the relative speed differential between unicycles and regular bicycles is significant—forcing unicycles to operate under the same conventions as bicycles is inconsistent with the policy’s stated aim of promoting safety.

    The average speed of a standard 20 inch unicycle is approximately 7-8km/h (if the rider is in shape) — not much faster than brisk walking speed. By contrast, nearly 90% of bicycle commuters have an average speed of 18-25km/h or greater (per the cyclist speed profile provided in this agenda item’s background file). This represents a material gap in average speeds between the two vehicle types. The speed gap between unicycles and motor vehicles is even larger.

    Speed differentials between e-bikes and regular bicycles were cited as a key factor in shaping the proposed policy changes—why create another instance of the very problem we are trying to solve?

One wheel.

Two wheels. See the difference?

Context and background information

Up to this point, unicycles have mostly existed in an ambiguous discretionary area not particularly subject to strict statutory regulation—with respect to roadways and sidewalks in the City of Toronto. However, the proposed policy revision before the Committee arbitrarily includes unicycles as part of a harmonized definition of “bicycle”:
The General Manager, Transportation Services recommends that: 
City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 608, Parks; Municipal Code Chapter 886, Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks; and Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking to delete the existing definitions of bicycles, as described in Appendix A attached to this report, and replace them with the following harmonized definition of bicycle:
BICYCLE – Includes a bicycle, tricycle, unicycle, and a power-assisted bicycle which weighs less than 40 kg and requires pedalling for propulsion (“pedelec”), or other similar vehicle, but does not include any vehicle or bicycle capable of being propelled or driven solely by any power other than muscular power.
(Recommendation #1, from PW28.2)

The inclusion of unicycles may seem innocuous, but it would have a damaging spillover impact in the context of Municipal Code § 950-201: Regulations for bicycles and mopeds, subsection C(2), where the recommended textual change is that:
No person age 14 and older shall ride a bicycle on a sidewalk of any highway, except for those locations designated in § 886-6, of Municipal Code Chapter 886, Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks
(Recommendation #5 & Appendix C, from PW28.2)

In other words, according to the proposed changes, persons (age 14 and older) would be prohibited from legally riding unicycles on the sidewalk—if unicycles are included in the definition of bicycle.

Rather than force unicyclists onto the roadways or bike lanes, where potentially dangerous speed differentials and vehicular behavioural expectations are at play, I recommend that unicyclists should continue to be given the leeway to exercise responsible judgment as to where they should ride most safely and appropriately with respect to others, whether that be on the road or the sidewalk.

Importantly, note that unicyclists riding on the sidewalk are already subject to Ch.950, Article III, Subsection 950-300, which states:
No person shall ride upon or operate a bicycle [with a tire size less than or equal to 61.0 centimetres (24 inches)—this provision to be deleted per PW28.2 Rec. #5, Appendix C], skateboard, in-line skates or roller-skates, coaster, scooter, toy vehicle, toboggan, sleigh, or any similar device on a sidewalk recklessly or negligently or at a speed or in a manner dangerous to the public, having regard to circumstances.
To reiterate, unicyclists will continue to be subject to municipal bylaw enforcement if they are riding recklessly or negligently. Further regulation is not required at this time. 

Conclusions

  1. The harmonized municipal definition of ‘bicycle’ should not include unicycles.
  2. Forcing unicyclists to ride on the road is likely to create the very speed differential issues which the proposed revisions are in principle trying to solve.
  3. Unicyclists on the sidewalk are already subject to bylaw enforcement prohibiting reckless or negligent riding, and do not require further regulation.
  4. Number of GTA unicycle-related traffic accidents and infractions in 2013: Zero. Let’s keep it that way.
The unicycle community in Toronto—while diverse and eclectic—is generally well behaved with respect to observance of bylaws and traffic conventions. It would be quite unfortunate for this policy change to unwittingly create scofflaws out of this playful and carefree group of environmentally-friendly citizens. It would be even more unfortunate if the safety of this group and others were to be compromised by careless inclusion in the bylaw.

Thank you for your attention to this serious matter. I look forward to your considered response,

Nathan Ng
Toronto One-Wheel Exhibition League


File images of unicycle and bicycle courtesy of Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license [link].