Wolfram|Alpha and my Friend Network

Wolfram|Alpha updated their Personal Analytics for Facebook tool. To be honest I’d forgotten about it.

My friend network
The generated report doesn’t really tell me anything super-amazing about my Facebook usage and network, but it still has a couple of interesting tidbits...

Apparently my friend network boils down to just four relatively-unrelated major clusters (see right).

Most of my friends have a few hundred friends:

Number of friends per friend

The wordcloud from my wall posts is disappointingly bland. My vocabulary could use a thesaurus upgrade, I guess. And I would have hoped ‘Yay’ would occur more often:


If you’re curious about how your usage of Facebook stacks up, head over to Wolfram|Alpha and run a report against your account!

Note: requires you to give significant permissions to the Wolfram|Alpha app to generate the report... (I allowed it, then disabled it after running the report. Of course in that timeframe they can slurp basically anything they want about you into their database.)

Beyond The Pink: The Subversion Of Barbie

Image: Barbie is a modern doll with a classic sensibility
Barbie: “A modern doll
with a classic sensibility”
Barbie is iconic.

Ubiquitous, and evocative, she is an inscrutable Mona Lisa for our times. Her pink-themed branding aggressively colonizes entire sections of every mainstream toy store.

Critics have decried the doll’s image for the 50 years of her existence. Yet her glamorous power endures within our cultural topography.
“Women my age know whom to blame for our own self-loathing, eating disorders and distorted body image: Barbie.” 
- Amy Dickinson, Time Magazine

The Iron Maiden of The Beauty Myth?

Barbie for President:
‘Iron Maiden’ or
aspirational?
In her best-selling feminist work, The Beauty Myth, Naomi Wolf describes the pernicious effects emanating from a widespread societal obsession with a coercive ideal of feminine appearance.

In Wolf’s view, the mis-proportioned figure of Barbara Millicent Roberts almost certainly embodies this malign ideal -- an unrealistic ‘iron maiden’ from which young women struggle to escape.

Meanwhile, Mattel, the maker of the doll, brightly and optimistically casts Barbie as an empowering, aspirational model -- a toy manifestation of the American dream where any identity is possible.

Which view is correct?

Iconoclasts and Subversion

Tom Forsythe was famously sued by Mattel, for his absurdist Food Chain Barbie photographic series. His challenging legal journey opened the path for other artists to freely experiment with Barbie-themed images, without fear of litigation.

Fondue For Three - Tom Forsythe
This series sparked a 5 year legal battle with Mattel
over fair use, free speech and artistic expression

I want to mention and share the work of several such artists, each of whom leverages and re-mixes the standard portrayal of Barbie in some way. The sequence progresses from coy and conventional, through to a much darker world view.

These images form entry points for reflection on our deeply persistent cultural relationship with Barbie. Our understanding of her turns out to be as mutable as the clothes she wears.

Barbie’s Wedding

Beatrice De Guigne captures “Barbie and Ken’s Wedding” through the ironic lens of an actual wedding photographer...

Beatrice De Guigne’s Wedding Photography
Click here to view series

This series is kind of cute, even saccharine, and is more of a playful take on stereotypical wedding photos, than it is a commentary on the Barbie universe. But this naturally leads to the question, “What happens after the wedding?”

The next two photographers suggest some possible, not entirely happy answers...

in the dollhouse

Dina Goldstein’s ‘in the dollhouse’ series features real-life models posed as Barbie and Ken.

It purports to examine ‘the less than perfect life of B and K. B is a super doll, the most successful doll in the world. Her partner K is grappling with his sexuality and finds himself in a loveless marriage. He struggles with his position in the household and faces his lack of authenticity.’

Dina Goldstein’s ‘in the dollhouse’: an unhappy marriage?
Click here to view series

Check out Dina Goldstein’s ‘in the dollhouse’.

Goldstein is most well known for her Fallen Princesses project, which creatively imagines less-than-idyllic scenes of post-fairy-tale life.

Mariel Clayton: Disturbing Yet Funny

Mariel Clayton’s work takes the Barbie aesthetic, and corrupts it. The results are disturbing, incorporating elements of sexuality and grisly force.

Ontario-based Clayon’s meticulously arranged dioramas often show the aftermath of violence. Barbie exists, in this world, as a smart, sexy, psychotic -- in control of herself and the situation -- rather than as a vapid materialist concerned solely with clothes and fashion.

Mariel Clayton: Grim humour amidst banal clutter
Click here to view more

WARNING: SCENES OF VIOLENCE AND SEXUALITY.

I particularly appreciate the careful detailing of each photograph. Clayton’s rooms are filled with the banal clutter of domesticity, a mundane backdrop to the turbulence elsewhere in the scene.

We are drawn into a fantastic and gruesome world where Barbie has taken matters into her own hands — a world where she has liberated herself from the drudgery of her consumer existence. The message is anarchic. Irreverent. And, I think, delightful.

Mariel Clayton’s work on Facebook
Mariel Clayton’s website

Barbie: She Is Us

profile image of Barbie
Barbie: a fascinating figure
Barbie influences -- and represents -- our cultural values in many ways, whether we approve or not. She is our Madison Avenue Madonna, our corporate-generated Venus. She is a fascinating figure, at once the subject and object of artistic critical interpretation.

500 years from now, historians and anthropologists will study the doll, and her endless accessories, as valuable indicators of our fashions, social institutions, customs and mores (A visit to Barbie’s Facebook page or her YouTube channel is remarkably instructive).

What is your opinion of Barbie? If you are a woman, did you play with Barbie as a child, and how did you interact with the doll? If you are a man, to what extent did Barbie shape your impression of feminine beauty? What role, if any, did Barbie have in forming your expectations of gender norms?

If you are a parent -- are you going to buy Barbie for your children, or will you attempt to shield them from ‘princess’ culture?

[LINK: Aqua - Barbie Girl]

Bonus Barbie: What would Barbie look like as an average woman?

Nickolay Lamm recently released a short set of of photos depicting a normally proportioned Barbie that he fashioned using a 3D printed model (based on CDC measurements of an average 19 year old American woman). The contrast is striking.

Nickolay Lamm's 'average Barbie'.
Click here to view more.

Lamm discusses the process he undertook to create this version here.

See Also

Barbie.com (Official Barbie site)
Barbie History
Life In Plastic (The Economist)

On the way at Front and Bathurst...

It looks like that condo project at Front and Bathurst is finally proceeding.


To recap: Minto, the development company, rushed to demolish the lovely 120 year-old building that used to be there. A year early. I guess I’m still sore about that. I feel like that tiresome guy who just won’t shut up about a particular topic.

One day I’ll get over it.

See Also

The Bathurst Rock Oasis -- A Look Back
Condo Developer Borg
No, I’m not involved with StopMintoFreed
The Wreck of Rock Oasis -- in Pictures

Hurrah For The Ontario Access Coalition

The other day at the gym, someone asked me about the meaning of the Ontario Access Coalition sticker on my water bottle.

I laughed, and sheepishly told them that, although I’ve been a member in the past, I don’t have anything to do with the OAC in terms of participation. But I’m appreciative that the OAC exists, generally -- and here’s why...

What does the Ontario Access Coalition do?

The OAC works “to keep [Ontario] climbing and bouldering areas open in an environmentally responsible manner.”

Which is a noble way of saying, it’s a volunteer not-for-profit that deals with the thorny world of access issues.

Somebody has to put in the interminable, tedious hours to advocate, communicate, and hand-hold with other climbers, parks management, government agencies, private land-owners, conservation authorities, and other stakeholders -- from the perspective of climbers.

Few individuals have the time, resources -- or persistence -- to sustain that sort of activity. Even mentioning it makes my eyes glaze over. Plus, climbers can be a fractious lot. Having a patient group of moderately organized volunteers -- with a mandate that most people can agree on -- provides continuity, and a single voice in those discussions, which literally take place over the course of years and never end.

To me, as a climber, the value is clear. I’m thankful that someone else is doing that work, to enable access for all of us -- even when I’m not totally in agreement with everything that they’re doing, or overly impressed with the glacial pace of progress on certain issues.

Examples of Ontario Access Coalition wins

Did you know that bouldering in Niagara Glen was nearly banned in 2009? Over the following two year period, the OAC worked with the Niagara Parks Commission to formally legitimize bouldering in the area in the context of a fee and waiver system. Sure, a lot of people I know weren’t happy about the implementation of fees -- but I also know they were grateful that the activity wasn’t banned altogether.

There’s a similar story with respect to the restoration of bouldering access at Halfway Log Dump -- a difficult, bureaucratic process that played out over seven years with Parks Canada. Without the intervention of the OAC, climbers might not have legal access to those (and other) areas.

In addition to that work, the OAC also provides crag statuses, coordinates area clean-up days, and holds occasional talks. All good stuff for the community.

The OAC Code of Ethics

If you’re visiting Ontario or otherwise climbing in the region, these are the ethics the OAC promotes:
  • Aspire to climb and boulder without leaving a trace
  • Maintain a low profile
  • Use existing trails
  • Dispose of human waste properly
  • Understand and respect historical ethics and restrictions [cough. Oh, Ontario!]
  • Respect the rules
  • Park and camp only in designated areas
  • Climb and boulder safely
  • Increase climber awareness of key plant species to be protected

Find out more about the OAC

Some links to check out:
TwitterFacebookGoogle+Ontario Access Coalition website

    It’s a $5 donation for a lifetime individual membership. Be glad someone is on our side, doing the boring dirty work. If you climb outside in Ontario, you ought to sign up -- if only for the climbing karma!