Why I Switched My Search Engine to DuckDuckGo...

DuckDuckGo: Clean, simple search
Eight months ago, I decided to switch my default search engine away from Google, and to instead try an alternate service.

After some deliberation, I chose DuckDuckGo. What has it been like? Is it worth switching?

Why I Switched

For some time, the purity of Google’s search has been violated and diluted, due to the Filter Bubble effect. This commercial explains what I mean:


[LINK]

I guess I’m not really comfortable with the idea of Google amassing a silent log of my search history, either. I’m a regular Google services user (Gmail, Reader, Photos/Picasa, Blogger, and even Google+, rarely), so granted it’s ridiculous for me to assume this stance -- I’ve already handed over a boatload of personal information to Google. They own my online profile.

Nevertheless, I made the switch (including changing the default search in my browser preferences) and would like to report on the experience.

What it’s like using DuckDuckGo

I’d say overall it’s... tolerable.

The results are clean, and simple, and... usually what I’m looking for. Let’s say 75% of the time. The other 25% I will perform the query again, using the !g command to see what Google has to say. (DuckDuckGo supports a powerful and nerdy ‘bang’ command that can be used to query specific sources, like Wikipedia, Amazon, YouTube, and, yes, Google.). [the !g initiates an encrypted Google search, by the way, which prevents snooping by third parties, so it’s still better than a ‘naked’ Google search]

That sounds annoying but actually, I find that comparing the two result sets can be instructive -- and Google doesn’t necessarily always find the right stuff. There are times when DuckDuckGo fails to provide good answers for recent items (news-related for example), but I get the feeling it’s been improving gradually...

So am I going to switch back to Google? Nope.

Here is some additional DuckDuckGo propaganda that explains why it’s a great candidate for your default search engine:

[LINK]

Less clutter, user privacy, and non-filtered results. That’s why I’ve switched to DuckDuckGo.

Try it out, you might like it too!

Coming Up: Spooky Shred & FUBU Race Weekend

Two splendiferous events from Toronto’s gregarious longboarding community are rapidly approaching: the Spooky Shred and the FUBU Race Weekend!

Spooky Shred - October 28

Spooky Shred Event Poster
The Spooky Shred is a wacky Halloween-themed skateboarding session that is taking place primarily at the Jane Paths (aka Smythe Park, north of Jane and St. Clair).

The presenters, Bombora Boards and the Skate Invaders, are organizing “a super special day full of awesome skating fun. There will be mini games for the gromlets and a Tunnel of Doom courtesy of Bombora boards. Mini games will include bobbing for wheels, slide and toss, and many more.”

The provisional schedule says that mini games will start at 5, the costume contest at 6, and the race after dark. And the organizers have tons of prizes to give away...

This is what the push looked like last year:
[LINK]

It’s my understanding that folks are meeting at Runnymede station around 4:45 and skating up to the Jane Paths. In costume, of course!

Event details thread

FUBU Race Weekend - November 3 & 4

FUBU Race Weekend Poster
The FUBU (For Us By Us) Race Weekend is a female-oriented skate extravaganza put on by Toronto Girls Longboarding.

Saturday features a twilight waterfront cruise, followed by a pre-race party at Club 54 (the somewhat notorious T.O. Skate House). Sunday is race day at Canoe Landing Park, incorporating a friendly slalom race and then a Toonie race. Then there’s a BBQ!

Female skaters of ALL skill levels (including beginners and novices) are invited.

Did I mention there are fabulous prizes?!

Incidentally -- supportive guys are more than welcome; just keep in mind that this particular event is focused on our distaff friends...

Here’s my writeup of last year’s get-together:
Speed! Thrills! Women! FUBU Skate Race Recap

FUBU 2011 Group Photo

Event details thread

Go Forth and Shred

Both of these sessions -- supported by multiple sponsors -- promise to be fantastic fun for everyone. Mark your calendars and check ’em out.

Spread the word! If you know anyone who’d like to participate, please send them this post!

Past skate coverage from me


Sortable -- a great tool for deciding what (camera/phone/laptop/tv) to buy

Sortable is a cool little company that I’ve been following for awhile.

Sortable product comparison tool
They produce an efficient, beautifully laid out ‘decision-engine’ that helps users rank and compare consumer gadgets.

I’ve found their site extremely useful for doing research on phones and cameras.

You can easily look up everything you want to know about a product, compare it to the competition, as well as view a high-level summary of why you might be interested. It’s all about ferreting out what will suit your needs and make you happy, from a sea of competing gadgets.

I highly recommend checking out Sortable.

Continuing growth and product evolution

Comprised of a small team based in my home town of Waterloo, the company was originally incarnated as Snapsort. Snapsort and its sister sites were relaunched at the beginning of this year under the umbrella Sortable brand. Then in July, they were acquired by Rebellion Media. Positive word of mouth -- like this post, for example -- has fuelled usage to over 17 million visitors and 41 million recommendations.

Their site has been evolving features and getting better all the time -- and I love that it happens to be in directions that I agree with.

For example, I had previously written (about Snapsort), that they should incorporate:
a curated set of links to external in-depth reviews from major third parties, e.g. CNET, dcresource.com, Engadget, and so forth. [...] Perhaps a separate 'Reviews' tab? 
What happened? Sortable has a Reviews tab for products, that excerpts quotes from major reviews as well as comments from the discussion community -- and links to the source material.

I also wrote,
The [one product] price comparison feature is presently weak...
They addressed that criticism by essentially eliminating the feature and quoting a single representative product price from Amazon. It’s a lot simpler and less confusing this way.

Lastly, I wrote,
I’m curious to see whether in the future they'll expand their offering to cover other product types, like cars or televisions or mobile phones and tablets. 
Guess what, Sortable features sections for phones, tablets, laptops and televisions (in addition to the seminal camera engine. They tested a car comparison site too, but it looks like it didn’t pan out). I presume that they are going to continue to carefully select and expand to additional domains for their decision engine.

So I commend the Sortable team for continually refining their tool. I’m sure it was just a coincidence, but it’s super fun when a company seems to read your mind about where to take a product.

Online discussions: building a community

Gadget geeks love to discuss products.

Sortable invites people to post questions and answers
A relatively new feature of Sortable is their discussion area, which provides a vaguely StackExchange (or Quora)-like forum for posting questions and answering other people’s questions.


Answers can be voted on by other users, so the best answers tend to bubble up to the top.

At the moment the discussion areas are fairly sparse, but if it takes off (and it ought to, given the volume of users each month) I can see this becoming a very complementary aspect to the site.

Recency Weakness

Sortable’s ranking and sorting algorithm sometimes generates erratic results, particularly for newly released products -- for example, the new iPhone 5 is currently way down on their list of top phones -- but that tends to be something that self-rectifies itself over time, as their database gets populated with information and reviews.

This is a design tradeoff I reluctantly accept -- higher quality detailed results over less optimized holistic output. In a similar fashion, I choose to use an alternate default search engine, Duckduckgo, which is superior to Google in many ways, but is also weak on recency.

In any case while the score rankings are occasionally debatable, the detailed product views and the comparison tool are quality resources.

Contest -- win an iPad 3!

Sortable is holding a contest in which you can win an iPad3! I love contests, don’t you? Enter hereFull disclosure: I’ve entered this contest too, and the above is (presumably) my referral link. If you don’t want me to get extra entries, use this link.


tldr: Summary

Of the product research and comparison tools that are out there, for the particular domains it services, I think Sortable is the best in class at what it does. Their site aesthetic is lovely and makes me want to click on stuff.

If you’re shopping for a gadget, check out Sortable!

Parody Re-Mix of the TTC Union’s $1 Million Ad

The TTC workers’ union launched a million-dollar ad campaign recently, bemoaning the recent trend of budget freezes and privatization.

As part of their Protecting What Matters campaign, they’ve released an extremely slick commercial that has everyone chattering about its superb production values.

When I saw it, I knew right away that it deserved a re-imagination as a horror movie trailer. It’s just too over the top and serious to resist. A few slight adjustments -- and voilà! I give you Saw: Protecting What Matters.


[LINK]

If you haven’t seen the original TTC workers’ union ad, here it is for comparison:


[LINK]

Sources

Clips have been sourced as follows:
Video clips: Protecting What Matters, SAW trailer
Audio: SAW trailer

Disclaimers and disclosure for CYA

This is a parody. It’s meant as a humorous, fair-dealing critique of the original ad, to which I’ve linked and for which I have mentioned the creators. This specific video, while containing clips produced by the TTC worker’s union, does not purport to represent the union or its members in any way. Nor is it representative of LionsGate Films or Air Castle Films. I am not affiliated with the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113. I am however a regular TTC user. Actors shown are depicted in a fictional sense and accompanying audio should not be taken as having anything to do with the actual people. 
In summary, please have a sense of humour.
With respect to contracting out, I will reserve comment within this particular post. I have faith that the TTC Board, with input from city council -- and from the TTC worker’s union as well as users of the system -- will find an acceptable solution to the matter at hand...


See Also


Mirvish / Gehry King West Project Heritage Implications

Visually arresting design?
The base of the Mirvish / Gehry King West proposal
Image courtesy Gehry International
I have mixed feelings about the proposed project on King Street West from local magnate David Mirvish and the renowned architect Frank Gehry.

Even from the preliminary sketches and models, it is easy to tell that the project would be transformative along that stretch of downtown. My hesitation comes from that transformative process. As ever in Toronto architecture, it feels like we are embarked upon a pell-mell rush to forget the past, and to strike forward with new designs regardless of the implications.

Transformative skyline impact
-- and on the downtown core.
Image courtesy Gehry International
What is at risk? The mainstream media have primarily focused on the requisite demolition of the Princess of Wales Theatre.

However, it is actually the obliteration of the flanking heritage buildings which concerns me the most.

The theatre is but a couple of decades old; the neighboring warehouses, meanwhile, have stood for over a century in some cases, and connect us directly to an earlier version of our city.

Here are four useful articles which document the history and heritage of the buildings that may be destroyed in the course of building this project. These Edwardian Classical warehouses may be modest in outward appearance, but they represent a doughty link to Toronto’s manufacturing past. They have cultural and historical significance.

Am I simply being timorous, and resistant to change? Is future progress worth the sacrifice of our heritage stock? As I said at the outset, I’m torn. I’ve written in the past about how gentrification and development produced a creeping conversion of the King-Spadina area just to the west; this project will be considerably less subtle in its impact.
“I am not building condominiums. I am building three sculptures for people to live in.”
- David Mirvish, Oct 1, 2012 

Development in the core bespeaks a thriving, vibrant city. So I’m not against it for the sake of being against it. Many economic benefits would be generated out of this project.

The nightmare scenario would be if the heritage structures were razed, and then the scheme stalled and the site became derelict. Suppose the Toronto condo market went bust at a critical juncture, as it does cyclically. Would the project still be completed? A development of this size and scope invariably faces years of planning, approvals, negotiations, and challenges.

We shall see what happens with this important site.

This interview with Mirvish gives some insight into his goals for the project. His candid answer to the question at 6:56 is illuminating.

[LINK]

What do you think of the proposal? Do you like the design? Are you concerned about the loss of the heritage buildings, or do you think it’s worth it in the name of new construction?

See also
Updated Plans (Feb. 2013)

'Oh How Love' - Lisa Conway

Using photographs from the City of Toronto Archives, Lisa Conway gives us this wistful video of our city’s past, directed by Marc de Pape. See if you can recognize the photo locations! Looks fantastic in full screen mode...


[LINK]

(h/t to: Spacing)