Pay what you want for Humble Indie Bundle 3

Five awesome cross-platform indie games. Pay what you want. DRM free. Sound appealing?

Check out the Humble Indie Bundle 3, available until August 8!



You get to decide how the payment is split up -- between the independent game developers, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Child’s Play charity. And they take PayPal, so you don’t even have to expose your credit card number.

For cheapskate, non-regular-gameplayers like me, it’s an opportunity to explore some titles super-inexpensively -- and if it turns out I actually like one, I can top up the payment later. You can literally choose to pay a penny for $50 worth of games! Though most people are considerably more generous.

There’s typically at least one ‘quality’ game in these bundles (in the first indie bundle it was World of Goo, in the second it was Osmos), and it looks like Crayon Physics Deluxe is the one I’ll be spending the most time on (though Cogs looks pretty fun). [This is not to disparage the efforts of the other developers; different people will find different games enjoyable, and in fact that’s part of the appeal of the bundle -- you get to try a bunch of games at once, and what one person likes another might not. For example, I hated the gameplay for Samarost 2 and Machinarium, but critics seem to think they were works of beauty.]






I like the model, as an experiment. It lets people pay what they feel is a fair amount, and the game developers get a boost of revenue -- and exposure -- that they might not otherwise generate on their own.

Past bundles have been quite successful, selling over $1.25- and $1.8 million worth of games.

Interestingly, 25% of the traceable downloads (for the first bundle) came from piracy -- people posting and forwarding the download links that are sent upon purchase. Since the games are DRM free, there isn’t any restriction on this activity.

This lends itself to an interesting cultural commentary on people’s attitudes towards intellectual property with respect to software game development -- when even a penny is sufficient transactional friction to drive someone to obtain software through non-standard channels.

Karl Marx would probably have something pithy to say about this. How would his labour theory of value be influenced by a world where the outputs of labour can be digitally replicated at (essentially) zero cost?


Signed up for the fall Waterfront half-marathon!

Yours truly at Around the Bay
I just signed up for the Scotiabank 2011 Fall Half Marathon. It’s been a while since I did any running events, due to injury -- and general slothfulness. (Last time I did this course, I had to walk it because of horrible shin splints incurred at a previous charity run!)

I need this motivator.This will be a step towards either another half in the spring, followed by a full marathon next fall. Or, if I’m feeling aggressive... possibly Around the Bay in March leading up to a full marathon. [Now that the Goodlife Marathon has been moved to May, there’s a local option for a spring attempt.

I’m probably going take this one easy -- cruise in somewhere between 1:55 and 2 hours. Just enough to get the engines going, right in the middle-back of the curve. Hopefully some of my friends will also participate.

It’s been far too long since I was in decent running shape! I’ve forgotten about the freeing nature of running. Time to get some mileage in... I’ll post progress updates as I see fit.

Ontario Veterans’ Memorial Typo: 2nd Attempt

UPDATE: Hilarity ensues -- read the official response I received from Major-General Richard Rohmer, the Memorial Advisory Committee Co-Chair...

Original post:
-----------

A couple of years ago, I wrote to the Ontario Minister of Government Services about a typographical error on the Ontario Veterans’ Memorial at Queen’s Park. The mistake -- at the top of the dedicatory inscription by Jane Urquhart -- remains uncorrected, and I never received any response.

The Jane Urquhart inscription on the Ontario Veterans’ Memorial features a homophonic error -- ‘discrete’ should be ‘discreet’

We’ve changed Ministers in the interim, so perhaps a fresh attempt at fixing the typo will be fruitful. If the glitch was buried deep inside the text, it probably wouldn’t bother me too much. Unfortunately, it occurs on the 2nd line of the Memorial’s prominent central bronze plaque -- you can’t miss it.

The bronze inscription in the context of the Memorial -- front and centre

Urged by a friend to try again, I’m sprinkling a few extra cc’s into the mix this time around.

“Aren’t there more critical issues to focus on? Isn’t this just frivolous pedantry?”

A legitimate question. The answer is yes -- and no.

The Memorial is intended to serve as a powerful symbol for all of us. Every last aspect of it was meticulously planned and thought out, via a lengthy consultative process, to achieve the maximum impact and emotional resonance. It is a literal tribute to our veterans -- so if the execution of the Memorial is flawed, that reflects poorly on us and on our respect for their sacrifices.

If the symbology is important, then getting every picayune detail right is equally as important.

100 years from now, what will our great-grandchildren think? Our posterity is at stake. Let’s see if aught results...

Spelling gadflies unite!

It’s also reasonable to ask, “Is it actually an error? Perhaps Urquhart intended to use the word ‘discrete’.”

I’ve heard a plausible argument that ‘discrete’ is in fact consistent with ‘One by one’ in the first line. If that’s the case, then doesn’t that make the French translation a bit ambiguous? I’d wager most people would interpret ‘avec discrétion’ to mean discreetly, rather than separate or distinct -- or literally discrete. I think it’s problematic either way.

Letter sent as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------
July 26, 2011

To: 
The Honourable Harinder Takhar, MPP
Ontario Minister of Government Services

cc: 
The Honourable Dalton McGuinty, MPP, Premier of Ontario
Tim Hudak, MPP, Niagara West – Glanbrook, Ontario PC Leader
His Honour the Honourable David Onley, Lt. Gov. of Ontario
Major-General (ret’d) Richard Rohmer, O.C., C.M.M., Q.C.,
Veterans’ Memorial Advisory Committee Co-Chair
   
Subject:
Error on Ontario Veterans’ Memorial


Minister Takhar,

I am writing to call your attention to a typographical error on the Ontario Veterans’ Memorial at Queen’s Park, which, although minor in nature, nevertheless ought to be fixed.

Specifically, the Jane Urquhart inscription on the central bronze plaque starts with the text:
One by one they left behind the bright fields of innocence and stepped into the darkness of experience. Their brave departures were discrete and humble.
Contextually, the word ‘discrete’ should be ‘discreet’. The intended meaning is confirmed by the French translation: Ils ont quitté avec courage, discrétion et humilité. Given the central plaque’s prominence on the Memorial, and the fact that the error is at the start of the inscription, almost every visitor will see this incorrect word choice.

I trust that you will share my desire to have this corrected forthwith. In May 2009 I contacted your ministerial predecessor, Ted McMeekin, regarding this issue -- but did not receive any reply.

During the unveiling ceremony in 2006, the then-Minister for Government Services, Gerry Phillips, declared that the Memorial represents a ‘lasting and dignified tribute to Canadian veterans’.

I agree wholeheartedly. As a symbol of our respect, the Memorial should reflect our deepest appreciation for their sacrifices -- down to the final details. If the execution of the Memorial is flawed, that reflects poorly on us.

What I mean is -- if you value the symbol, then you have to ensure that the symbol is done properly. Would you raise a Canadian flag upside down? No, that would be disrespectful -- and it’s the same dynamic at play here. Do we care about the symbolic details, or are we indifferent? That’s the issue.

Thank you for your assistance. I look forward to your response and corrective action.

Yours sincerely,


Nathan Ng

Help send Pia to the World Championships in Austria!

Whenever Pia G happens to enter a bouldering competition I'm in, I secretly try my very hardest to beat her. If I've been training hard, and have a perfect day where everything magically goes right, and simultaneously she has a crappy session, I sometimes have a shot at it. Lately however, she's gone nuclear and is out of sight.  


Go Pia!!

Pia is a remarkable young climber who recently won the Canada Youth Cup for the 3rd year running. This qualified her to go to the upcoming European Youth Cup and the World Youth Rock Climbing Championships in Imst, Austria. 

Unfortunately, there is no government funding or program that covers rock climbing... she could really use some financial help, to get her across the pond. So her dad has assembled a comedy fundraiser show with several top comedians in the country for a night of hilarity at The Comedy Bar.
“Your $20 ticket gets you a special seat (of course all the seats are special) in the all-you-can-laugh buffet of hilarity Monday, August 8th, for the 7:30 or 9:30 show, as well as an overwhelming sense of pride for a chance to support a National Athlete in representing her country!”
More info on the Facebook event page
7:30 show tickets
9:30 show tickets
Comedy Bar schedule

Help send Pia to Austria! She's worked super hard to get to this point, to represent Canada  -- and she's a local climber too. Plus, she's awesome.

Spread the word. Go Pia!!

Commercial honeybee colonies continue to die off

A recent Globe and Mail article outlines how honeybee colonies used for farming continue to experience significant mortality rates -- 43% in Ontario in 2010-11.
“These kind of ... results are unsustainable. If any other livestock was suffering this sort of annual mortality, there would be a national outcry.” - Ontario Beekeepers’ Association president John Van Alten
Colony collapse disorder has ravaged North American commercial honeybee populations over the last few years. It is a worrisome trend. Possible interrelated causes for the spike in collapse rates include: pesticides, varroa mites, funguses, insect viruses, genetic deficiencies, pollution, and excessive transportation (which stresses out the hives).

I wonder what opinion Buzz
has on this issue...
I'm fascinated by this particular topic, because it touches on an aspect of our industrial food production chain that most people don't think much about. Namely, that we extensively -- and systematically -- use honeybees to pollinate a huge swathe of our crops.

Large-scale crop pollination isn't accomplished by natural populations of bees and insects anymore -- rather, we actively transport and distribute honeybees to different geographic areas as needed to perform the task. Hives are moved around and worked over a number of different locations during the growing season.

It's an intriguing example of man marshalling the forces of nature for his own uses -- and also of the risks we take when those forces fall out of our control. It's not just honey production that is at stake here; it is the productive capacity of our agricultural system.

It speaks to an overall process which -- on the surface at least -- seems almost unnatural -- where queen bees are a valuable commodity, not just the organic output of a hive's reproductive function.

Some apiarists charge that numerous elements of industrialized beekeeping tend to have problematic side effects, and result in unsustainable systems that ultimately collapse.

The charges deserve consideration:
  • Commercial bee populations tend to have a shallow gene pool, because it's more efficient to produce and breed a uniform, docile type of bee. When diseases emerge, the deleterious impact is much greater, due to the monocultural population.
  • Pesticides and antibiotics are overused to control mite infestations. We therefore inadvertently propagate bees that would otherwise be vulnerable to mites and other parasites. 
  • With deliberate use of artificially large cell foundation sizes, bees are hyperbred for greater size and productivity (larger cell sizes tend to result in physically larger bees) 
  • Other speculation involves the possible negative role of GMO and genetically engineered plants in the food chain 
The combination of these different factors produces commercial colonies at greater risk of collapse than 'natural' colonies, according to this particular perspective.

How can we reconcile this criticism with our ongoing need to reliably produce massive quantities of agricultural crops to feed our cities? Whether you find the arguments valid or not, the mounting death tolls in our commercial honeybee colonies is a matter for serious concern.

Are honeybees the proverbial canary in the coal mine? Do their deaths presage something more ominous? Is our food supply chain at risk? Is our current approach to beekeeping fundamentally flawed?

In our globalized world, the answers are not so clear.


ps. On a lighter note, I did send a quick note to Buzz, the Honeynut Cheerios mascot who is ostensibly 'Defender of the Honey', asking for his* position -- but unfortunately beyond an auto-form reply, I have not yet received any comment...

Update: I did get a response after all this morning, from Corporate.Response@genmills.com:
"Thank you for contacting our company with your inquiry. The website www.honeydefender.com is a website with games for children to play. It has nothing to do with protecting honey bees. We hope you find this information helpful. Please let us know if we can help you again. 
Sincerely,
P. Gordon
Consumer Services"
Zing! Poor P. Gordon. Trapped in a dreary cube somewhere inside General Mills, being forced to solemnly reply to rubbish queries like mine. 1 point awarded for being a good sport.


* technically, shouldn't Buzz be female?


Waffle House tattoo - now that's commitment!

I've previously written about my curious love for that fabulous icon of the American South, Waffle House -- but even I must concede that this wild tattoo seems a bit over the top...

Waffle House tattoo
This cake is awesome too, and rather less... threatening:

Happy Birthday Sean, whoever you are!

Paul Adams' Real Life Social Network

Google+, the new online social hub
There have been a lot of recent discussions regarding the release of Google+, the new information sharing service from the feverish mandarins of Mountain View.

Naturally, it has drawn a lot of comparisons to the gorilla in the social networking space, Facebook. Pundits and analysts are wondering how it will impact other tools like Skype, Twitter, and Tumblr.

To understand how these emerging services are struggling to cope with modeling our relationships and the accompanying flows of information, it is instructive to review Paul Adams' Real Life Social Network slideshow.

Paul Adams was formerly on the Google user experience team, and now works for Facebook. (When asked what he thought about Google+, Adams wrote "Seeing Google+ in public is like bumping into an ex-girlfriend.") Although Andy Hertzfeld is widely credited for his interaction design and implementation work on the Circles editor (sharing is controlled within Google+ using the concept of social circles), he inherited the model from Adams, according to TechCrunch's Alexia Tsotsis.

Adams explores at length the complexities of managing multiple independent groups of friends, strong vs weak vs temporary ties, the Dunbar number, influence, and the role of multiple identities in self-representation. He also throws in a discussion of privacy. It turns out there are many subtle and multi-dimensional challenges of modelling real-world relationships.

While Adams criticizes Facebook's broad default sharing approach, I rather enjoy the unpredictable confluence of my different social groups. I view the increased granular control over information provided by Google+ with ambivalence -- even though I know this attitude is problematic.

Check out Adams' slideshow:

The Real Life Social Network v2

Amusingly,  I found that my first 24 hours of activity on Google+ mostly consisted of replicating my existing Facebook and Twitter lists (Arguably the Circles functionality already existed in Facebook via lists, but the latter interface is awkward and inconvenient to use).

I found the naming choice of 'Circles' to be rich in unintended meaning. It immediately made me think of Eli Pariser's Filter Bubble. When I judiciously choose how my information is shared and retrieved, instead of ingesting, and disseminating it across a variety of sources -- and when everyone else does this too -- aren't we contributing to Pariser's problem? Aren't we trapping ourselves by design into bubbles of self-interested information? Is this the end of serendipity?

I really like the integration with the other products in the Google platform; I think this integration will give Google+ a much greater uptake than the ill-fated Wave or the annoying Buzz releases -- Google+ ties everything together. The next piece of functionality I'd like to see -- though I'm not sure how likely it is to come about -- is an integration of the flow with external sources, so I can arbitrarily choose to post on Google+, or Facebook, or Twitter, or some arbitrary combination of channels...

Adams' book on the subject (presumably drawn from the same materials as the slideshow) Social Circles: How offline relationships influence online behavior and what it means for design and marketing (Voices That Matter), is due to be published in August.

UPDATE
Apparently Google is legally preventing Adams from publishing the book even though "The book contains no proprietary information, it is based almost entirely on research from 3rd parties (mostly universities) and any Google research referenced is already in the public domain."

Very interesting! He's working on a new work called 'Grouped'. We'll see how that turns out.

Happy Canada Day!

Here's what The Globe instructed its readers to do 100 years ago on the front page of the July 1, 1911 edition:

From The Globe, July 1, 1911
Sounds about right to me...

Other headlines that day:
Lord Strathcona Resigns; Prince of Wales Coming
King George's Message to His Loyal Subjects
Don Rowing Club Destroyed By Fire
Crop Prospects Unusually Bright
Three Men Killed at the Soo
Bomb Outrage at Eucharistic Procession
Steamer Spokane Wrecked off Victoria
Canada's Seal Rights Criticized in Russia
Frank (Alta.) In Danger of Great Landslide

Incidentally this is the Prince of Wales in 1911:


Edward VIII. Though he was only formally invested as Prince of Wales July 11 of that year... Where would The King's Speech be without this fellow?

It looks like ideas about political reform haven't changed that much:



And for those of you thinking of going to the Island today, here's an advertisement for Hanlan's Point, "Canada's Coney Island" from that edition:


Eaton's wished its Canadian customers well:



Wireless technology was being developed:




And it's interesting to know that Kellogg's Corn Flakes have basically been unchanged...